Hi,
On Sat, 6 Jan 2018, Darius Blaszyk wrote:
> Again I would like to ask some support on a piece C code that I need to
> translate to pascal. The code in question is:
>
> #define MEMNEXT(x) ((MyStruct *)(((char *) x) - ((char *) & (((MyStruct
> *)0)->next
>
> What exactly is going on here?
Hi all,
Again I would like to ask some support on a piece C code that I need to
translate to pascal. The code in question is:
#define MEMNEXT(x) ((MyStruct *)(((char *) x) - ((char *) & (((MyStruct
*)0)->next
What exactly is going on here? Where does the result point to? It seems
like it
On 2018-01-02 15:30, Marc Santhoff wrote:
Sorry for mentioning something nasty like Java on this list.
The more I use Java (and the ecosystem around it) the more I love it. :)
It is expected that any developer these days are proficient in multiple
languages. Object Pascal (Delphi) and Java
On 05/01/18 16:41, Martok wrote:
is it possible that the register allocation on x86_64 is a bit inefficient? No
matter the optimization settings, I can never get FPC to use more than the rax
and rdx registers. Especially $Optimization REGVAR does nothing (not even for
loop variables).
Instead,
Hi all,
is it possible that the register allocation on x86_64 is a bit inefficient? No
matter the optimization settings, I can never get FPC to use more than the rax
and rdx registers. Especially $Optimization REGVAR does nothing (not even for
loop variables).
Instead, two nested loops are enough
