Ryan Joseph schrieb am Do., 6. Sep. 2018,
16:33:
>
>
> > On Sep 6, 2018, at 9:25 PM, Michael Van Canneyt
> wrote:
> >
> > No, the whole point of default is that they should be for any kind of
> field.
> > For example if you want a nullable boolean, you'll do something like
> >
> > Type
> >
> On Sep 6, 2018, at 9:25 PM, Michael Van Canneyt
> wrote:
>
> No, the whole point of default is that they should be for any kind of field.
> For example if you want a nullable boolean, you'll do something like
>
> Type
>TNullable= Record
>Private
> F : T;
> isAssigned :
On Thu, 6 Sep 2018, Ryan Joseph wrote:
On Sep 5, 2018, at 11:22 AM, Ryan Joseph wrote:
I just realized that default shouldn’t be allowed on non-object fields right? I
think that’s what was decided and makes most sense to me too. Disregard my last
email. Sorry if I make a bunch of noise
On Wed, 5 Sep 2018, Ryan Joseph wrote:
On Sep 4, 2018, at 7:15 PM, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal
wrote:
The idea of the default property is that *all* operators (and methods) (except management operators) are hoisted from the type of the default property. The assignment of one record with
> On Sep 5, 2018, at 11:22 AM, Ryan Joseph wrote:
>
> I just realized that default shouldn’t be allowed on non-object fields right?
> I think that’s what was decided and makes most sense to me too. Disregard my
> last email. Sorry if I make a bunch of noise while I’m working on this but
>
> On Sep 4, 2018, at 7:15 PM, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal
> wrote:
>
> Would you please stop thinking with the C operators? They are merely
> syntactic sugar and they don't exist by themselves. For this topic at least
> please stick to their full versions (in your example "rec := rec + 10")
Hello,
even if there's closed issue https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=34169 I
would like to ask if it can be reconsidered.
The subject is that SetLength now gives warning: Variable "dynamic array" of a
managed type does not seem to be initialized
in 3.3.1 and 3.1.1 while it doesn't
> On Sep 4, 2018, at 12:35 PM, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal
> wrote:
>
> I think you need to be clearer what you want to achieve in the end. The
> default property as intended by Maciej has the idea that it hoists the
> operators of the default property type to the record it is contained in.
> On Sep 4, 2018, at 7:15 PM, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal
> wrote:
>
> The idea of the default property is that *all* operators (and methods)
> (except management operators) are hoisted from the type of the default
> property. The assignment of one record with default property to another of
Hello,
even if there's closed issue https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=34169 I
would like to ask if it can be reconsidered.
The subject is that SetLength now gives warning: Variable "dynamic array" of a
managed type does not seem to be initialized
in 3.3.1 and 3.1.1 while it doesn't
10 matches
Mail list logo
