>However, adding support for an option called -CFMax or similar should be no
problem.
It would be VERY much appreciated!
James
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Le 09/02/2024 à 20:53, Jonas Maebe via fpc-pascal a écrit :
However, adding support for an option called -CFMax or similar should
be no problem.
It would be very nice to compile old code
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http
On 09/02/2024 14:04, James Richters via fpc-pascal wrote:
Is there any way we can please get -CF80 or {$MINFPCONSTPREC 80} or some
other way to turn off the new behavior for applications that use Extended.
The reason I didn't add it back then is because when parsing the
options, there is no go
On 2/8/2024 11:01 AM, Martin Wynne via fpc-pascal wrote:
Hi Thomas,
The error is not the file content after "end.".
The error is not having the expected "end;" after "begin".
This works ok:
_
program test;
begin
end;
end.
abc 123
_
Martin.
>Because 1440.1 cannot be represented exactly as a single precision floating
point number. Nor as a double or extended precision floating point >number
for that matter, and in that case the compiler uses the maximum precision is
supported by the target platform.
I see that now, I think someone poi