olitechnic Faculty in Bucharest :D so time is of the esence
right now].
Sorry to ask you such questions, but information is quite sparse.
On Sunday 24 June 2007 20:19, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
> On 6/24/07, Catalin Zamfir Alexandru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Great. I&
Calculator respects it.
Any ideas?!
On Sunday 24 June 2007 13:33, Catalin Zamfir Alexandru wrote:
> Perfect. It compiled for GTK1 and that had big menus with big fonts,
> totally inesthetic.
>
> Anyway, now I have 0.9.23-beta with a SVN Revision: 11365. Is this the
> latest one that
On 6/24/07, Catalin Zamfir Alexandru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Can't find it in the Gentoo package maintainer. Damn ...
>
> It is a development package required to build gtk 1 applications. It
> must be there.
>
> If you find the gtk2 development packages but
Can't find it in the Gentoo package maintainer. Damn ...
On Sunday 24 June 2007 12:55, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
> libgdk-pixbuf-devel
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-
t; On 6/24/07, Catalin Zamfir Alexandru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ok. I'll grab a SVN Lazarus and recompile. I'm still using the FPC 2.0.4
> > and corespondent Lazarus.
>
> Lazarus and FPC don't make releases at the same time. There is usuall
Ok. I'll grab a SVN Lazarus and recompile. I'm still using the FPC 2.0.4 and
corespondent Lazarus. Updating sure makes wonders ...
On Sunday 24 June 2007 09:25, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
> On 6/24/07, Catalin Zamfir Alexandru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ok,
missing.
On Sunday 24 June 2007 08:18, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just fixed the menu bug =)
>
> I had to put a central widget, on top of which the other ones will be
> placed. The same thing the Gtk interface made.
>
> On 6/23/07, Catalin Zamfi
As I know of, FPC automatically detects which files should be recompiled.
Think it's a feature of FPC.
On Sunday 24 June 2007 06:03, Marc Santhoff wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is it possible to tell fpc to only replace macros in the code and
> store/show the generated file?
>
> Like Running "cpp myfile.c > m
2007 16:26, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
> On 6/23/07, Catalin Zamfir Alexandru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 2. Showing the Compiled version on QT, where the menu doesn't show but if
> > you click where it should have been, it opens, while the EditResult Field
> >
Yes, I use Linux, 2.6.18 kernel, but I really don't think that
something has
to do with this. Don't really think that the Mac problem repeats itself in
Linux.
I could try to change the "About" and "Close" captions, but really,
don't
think it would do any good. In any case, I'l
Please point me to the FreePascal/Lazarus BugZilla. :P
On Friday 22 June 2007 18:55, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
> On 6/21/07, Catalin Zamfir Alexandru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 1. MessageDlg function shows the text, but doesn't show the buttons
> > [mbOK]
; On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 14:30 +0200, Daniël Mantione wrote:
> > Op Thu, 21 Jun 2007, schreef Catalin Zamfir Alexandru:
> > > I may have the easiest job of them all. I'm updating my Gentoo QT to
> > > 4.3 which compiles the source, installs it and makes all necesary
>
I may have the easiest job of them all. I'm updating my Gentoo QT to
4.3
which compiles the source, installs it and makes all necesary adjustments.
Still compiling. 4 hours have passed and Qt is still compiling.
Sincerely,
don't know why I even bother, but once it's finished I
Ok, it works but I have problems:
1. MessageDlg function shows the text, but doesn't show the buttons [mbOK] and
[mbCancel].
2. The menu in KCalculator doesn't show. It's there, but the EditResult TEdit
component along with the butons just top it, instead of sitting right below
it, they float o
; Which I asume is the fact that I don't have QT 4.3 installed. Do you guys
> agree or think it's something else.
>
> On Thursday 21 June 2007 09:50, Catalin Zamfir Alexandru wrote:
> > Went and compiled Clean + Build on LCL, while setting the rest to None.
> >
.3 installed. Do you guys
agree or think it's something else.
On Thursday 21 June 2007 09:50, Catalin Zamfir Alexandru wrote:
> Went and compiled Clean + Build on LCL, while setting the rest to None.
> Selected Qt as interface and the went on with the normal compilation [Build
> Lazar
; From: Catalin Zamfir Alexandru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > According to the instructions on the Qt_Interface Lazarus Wiki Page.
>
> That is what I assume you did. But to make sure you did all the required
> steps, I asked if you could outline them in your own words.
>
&
I have Qt 3.6 [the last in the Gentoo package]. Do I really need Qt 4.3,
V1.37?!
On Friday 22 June 2007 01:00, micahel schneider wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 20 Juni 2007 schrieb Vincent Snijders:
> > On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 23:58:15 +0300
> >
> > Catalin Zamfir Alexandru <
According to the instructions on the Qt_Interface Lazarus Wiki Page.
On Thursday 21 June 2007 00:49, Vincent Snijders wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 23:58:15 +0300
>
> Catalin Zamfir Alexandru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yes, built LCL for the Qt Interface. Compilation we
Yes, built LCL for the Qt Interface. Compilation went great.
On Wednesday 20 June 2007 23:32, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
> On 6/20/07, Catalin Zamfir Alexandru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yes, and I get a "can't find unit qtint" error. Why that?
>
Yes, and I get a "can't find unit qtint" error. Why that?
On Wednesday 20 June 2007 19:53, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 18:58:31 +0300
>
> Catalin Zamfir Alexandru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello, I've made this KCalculator for KDE:
Hello, I've made this KCalculator for KDE:
http://kde-apps.org/content/show.php/KCalculator?content=60813
I want to compile the project in QT, not GTK2. How can I do that? When I try
it [switching from GTK2 to QT in the Compiler Options], the project.lpr file
opens up, instead of compiling.
He
Well, I know my Turbo Pascal and when I first started using FreePascal
I was
like: "WOW, this shit rocks!". Enough fun already, I'm interested in learning
more about :
- FreePascal
- Lazarus [I've been reading a 3042 page Delphi compilation just to understand
how to work with Lazarus a
Plus, you may have GCC with optimization flags on, due to your Linux system
[for example Gentoo] - whily FPC may be compiling its programs in the normal,
unoptimized way. This also may be a problem. Check it.
On Wednesday 13 June 2007 11:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi
>
> I wrote two programs
Guess because you're using inc(count) which may tell the compiler to use a
specific procedure, specific procedure that may have its own hidden
variables.
Use count := count + 1; and see what happens. This way you're not using the
inc() procedure that may be specific to the system unit.
On Wedn
If there was a petition for this, I would have signed it. We need SYNTAX
highlithing ... :P NOW. :D
If you do so, please use Geshi :D. It's the best and I use it a lot on
theg33ks.com in my articles.
On Thursday 07 June 2007 15:36, Johann Glaser wrote:
> Hi!
>
> When reading Freepascal Wiki pag
See the dateutls unit provided by FPC.
On Monday 04 June 2007 02:22, TOUZEAU DAVID wrote:
> Dear
>
> Is there a function that help me to calculate seconds since 1970 year ?
>
> exactly the same of this command :
>
> /bin/date +%s -d 20070103
>
> best regards
pgp5xqIQ1r2Yg.pgp
Description: PGP si
Because it's GPL/GNU? :)
On Monday 04 June 2007 04:23, Cesar Romero wrote:
> Catalin,
>
> Interesting stuff, unhappily the licence dont allow me to use in my
> business app.
>
> []s
>
> Cesar Romero
>
> > Hello,
> > Just wanted to contribute my two cents with this homemade Unit [attached
> >
Hello,
Just wanted to contribute my two cents with this homemade Unit
[attached to
the mail] for working with:
- Simple Linked Lists;
- Double Linked Lists;
- Stacks;
Don't know of any other unit that does this, but think it is of use to
the
day-to-day Pascal developer. Feedba
Ya, Pascal's better than C :P. That's my personal oppinion. And Free Pascal
is "the cherry on top".
On Monday 28 May 2007 13:55, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> On Sun, 27 May 2007, Francisco Reyes wrote:
> > Is there a separate list for documentation?
> >
> > In particular I was wondering if there
Ya, I mean if its an universal binary, it may as well run on any system, any
version. And as BSDs versions are related with each others, as well as with
Unix systems, why not?
On Monday 28 May 2007 10:26, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> > I was trying out a couple of examples and figured I would try
31 matches
Mail list logo
