Vincent Snijders wrote:
Elio Cuevas Gómez wrote:
These are all good things, but if the IDE editor can't handle basic
stuff like international characters it's not very useful.
For you. It is useful for most of the English speaking people and those
are quiet a lot too, although not as much
Seems like x64-linux fpc version doesn't support shared objects creations,
but
it stops only while linking... Is there any progress?
In the latest svn versions it links but libraries crash at run time. For
unknown reasons symbols aren't resolved.
___
Agustin Barto wrote:
a) Unicode didn't work for me on any (including the lastest) version
of Lazarus. I don't know if this is a bug related to my particular
enviroment (x86/FC4) or a limitation of the code editor.
Unicode can mean a lot?
b) When I really needed the multiplatform feature of
Agustin Barto wrote:
I was talking about design. One example? Polymorphism with primitive
data types can get really messy really fast with ObjectPascal. It's
not easy, for instance, to have a generic data structure that can
store *any* primitive data in a type-safe way.
Variants?
Agustin Barto wrote:
On 10/30/05, Florian Klaempfl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Agustin Barto wrote:
I was talking about design. One example? Polymorphism with primitive
data types can get really messy really fast with ObjectPascal. It's
not easy, for instance, to have a generic data structure
L505 wrote:
I got few suggestions, especially to target more Delphi developers.
1. Maybe it'll better for public and new users to know 1 product
instead of two: FPC (the compiler) and Lazarus (the IDE). Just like
Delphi for the compiler and the IDE in a single package. I still got
many times
Adriaan van Os wrote:
Carsten Bager wrote:
We are moving a lot of code from an old platform where it is
allowed to compare 2 records like this.
Type
A_typ=array[0..3] of integer;
Var
A1,A2:A_typ;
Begin
If A1=A2 then
End;
I know that I can typecast to an array of char to
the memory access
Regards
Carsten
--
Compiler version
Free Pascal Compiler version 2.0.0 [2005/05/15] for arm
Copyright (c) 1993-2005 by Florian Klaempfl
Target OS: Linux for ARM
___
fpc-pascal
Adriaan van Os wrote:
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Carsten Bager wrote:
I am using the compiler on an embedded Arm7 platform (no
operating system). So fare things are working ok, but now I have
discovered a problem when packing records (Vi have to maintain
bindery compatibility with older
Tomas Hajny wrote:
What exactly happens there now (I don't have an ARM, just curious ;-) )?
Is it that the compiler generates the code as it is instructed to do (i.e.
regardless the fact that it might not work under ARM),
Yes. That's common behaviour.
and that the
particular
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Sun, 9 Oct 2005, Tony Pelton wrote:
i started to write a rather lengthy reply to this note, and realized i
was starting to rant.
so i'm gonna shorten my reply up quite a bit.
i'm a java web app programmer by trade. i use Pascal for fun stuff.
up until
Rainer Hantsch wrote:
Yes, this is exactly what I am looking for.
What I wonder is that nobody found a way to open a X11 window redirect all
this stuff from/to it, since I started with Linux and FreePascal. -- And this
is more than 6 years ago.
All what would be required would be some
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
First, I'am sorry about the mailing list troubles the last weeks.
The mailing lists where moved to a new server which caused the trouble
some weeks ago. Since this mail server was running sendmail, mail
delievery was rather slow so I decided today to switch to postfix. As
you may have noticed,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you take into care that FPC handles in standard mode nested comments
correctly? I.e.
{ { } is an error while it works for other compilers?
FPC expects { { } } (same applies to (* *)).
___
fpc-pascal maillist -
Bob Barry wrote:
In the course of trying to compile fpc docs, I compared file msg2inc.pp
of svn to that of the fpc-2.0.0 source tarball. No change whatsoever
had been made to the code, but all the revision history has been
removed since fpc-2.0.0. This means that users will henceforth be
, at 16:55, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Paul Davidson wrote:
Darwin fails make all. Checked out revision 1075.
genmath.inc(1115,28) Fatal: Internal error 200507161
genmath.inc(1115,28) Fatal: Compilation aborted
Fixed.
make[7]: *** [system.ppu] Error 1
make[6]: *** [darwin_all] Error 2
make
Paul Davidson wrote:
Darwin fails make all. Checked out revision 1075.
genmath.inc(1115,28) Fatal: Internal error 200507161
genmath.inc(1115,28) Fatal: Compilation aborted
Fixed.
make[7]: *** [system.ppu] Error 1
make[6]: *** [darwin_all] Error 2
make[5]: *** [rtl] Error 2
make[4]: ***
Tomas Hajny wrote:
From: Tomas Hajny [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: FPC-Pascal users discussions
fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
Subject:Re: [fpc-pascal] fpc 2.0 and DOM/xml under OS/2 gives me
Process terminated by SIGSEGV
Send reply to:
Roberto Della Pasqua wrote:
Hi kind users,
I like ask how is the status of FPC64 under linux.
I can tell you what's the developer's opinion.
About:
- reliability (can be used to build 24x365 system tcp daemons?)
I think so, as long as you don't depend on seldomly used parts of the FCL.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
just trying to build fpc (today snapshot 2.1.X) for win32 plateform and
wince arm target.
i get the following error message ?
D:\FPC\2.1.x-srcmake all OPT=-vt CPU_TARGET=arm OS_TARGET=wince
CROSSBINDIR=d:\
fpc\cross\arm-wince BINUTILSPREFIX=arm-wince-
Marco van de Voort wrote:
I am in the first stage of creating a system unit for
Embedded ARM. Things are working but I get a lot of
Warnings and Hints (See some of them below).
Should I be worried about this?
I see no troubling ones. THe first few mean that generic might not be 64-bit
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Marco van de Voort wrote:
I am in the first stage of creating a system unit for
Embedded ARM. Things are working but I get a lot of
Warnings and Hints (See some of them below).
Should I be worried about
. -FUunits/i386-win32 -di386 tfileio.pas
Free Pascal Compiler version 2.0.0 [2005/05/08] for i386
Copyright (c) 1993-2005 by Florian Klaempfl
Target OS: Win32 for i386
Compiling tfileio.pas
fvcommon.pas(2,18) Fatal: Can't find unit FVCommon
fvcommon.pas(2,18) Error: Compilation aborted
make
L505 wrote:
I know nothing about the first program, executed by the first computer,
if that's what you are asking, but I guess it was probably written by
hand in machine language.
That leads to the first program that ran the first software program
actually being a hardware program. The
Matt Emson wrote:
Is there some posibility to make (compiling) fpc without fpc?
Is there some makefile or script in fpc (cvs) to avoid to use a fpc
1.0.0 or 2.0.0 to create a fpc new version?
Cygwin runs exclusively on Windows machines... FPC has a Windows port.
Whilst I can see the point
Agustin Barto wrote:
I have to build some container classes (like java Vector) for a
project. I was thinking on how to store some primitive values (so far
I only need to store Integer, Real or Extended and ShortString) and I
can't decide between variants (variant arrays) and variant records
Vincent Snijders wrote:
Hi,
Suppose I have the following code:
var
a,b: dword;
c: qword;
begin
a := 1000;
b := 2000;
c := a * b;
writeln(c);
end.
Now, although c is large enough to contain the result only the lower
dword is filled. I can force correct
Matt Emson wrote:
Just laid my hands on a used Zaurus SL5500. I was wondering how stable the
Zaurus cross compiler and QT wrapper were?
Should be very usable.
I realise this is slightly off
topic, but I remember the developer working on the bindings posted to this
list a while back.
Paul Davidson wrote:
Having problem with app. It is rule based, and operates with recursion.
Events, such as HTTP requests, timers etc, are processed in separate
threads such that rule engine can handle more than one request at a time.
When a rule cascade recurses for 10th time, a thread
L505 wrote:
|
| Or if you wanted to prepend exceptions rather than catch them, the following
| function could also work have worked (note you have to do a shortString cast,
| AnsiStrings don't like access by character)
|
I was under the same impression for a long time, but some of the FPC RTL
Thomas Zastrow wrote:
John Coppens wrote:
On Fri, 08 Jul 2005 16:39:05 +0200
Thomas Zastrow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm converting some strings with strtoint into integers. But
sometimes the string can't be converted to a number. Is there a
function which takes a string and
Marc Santhoff wrote:
Hi,
since the website only seems to mention the Zaurus as device for running
fpc and executing it's program i assume (cross)compiling at least works
on linux.
What other op-sys's and devices are supported? Would any ARM-based
handheld do?
How about embedded linux
Gerhard Scholz wrote:
I have problems when compiling with -pg (profiler)
Is this my fault or a compiler error?
P:\FmtBCDppc386 -a -pg -Croit -Op1 testprof
Free Pascal Compiler version 2.1.1 [2005/06/25] for i386
Copyright (c) 1993-2005 by Florian Klaempfl
Target OS
and everything should work fine again though at least I lost some mails
when it came back because it ate some mails while the mail system wasn't
properly configured ...
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
www.freepascal.org which servers also svn.freepascal.org,
cvs.freepascal.org and the developer mails is currently down because the
hard disk with the root partition is broken. No data is lost but things
must be reinstalled which is planned to be done on the 28th June CET.
www.de.freepascal.org
Antal wrote:
in linux I can't use the exec for executing a program with more than one
parameter.
I tried to supply more than a parameter separeted with whitespace, but
it's not reliable, since the program is treating it as just one parameter
so I can't pass options to programs, such as:
ls -l .*
L505 wrote:
Are there any I Love Freepascal t-shirts, hats, coffee mugs, etc.?
Afaik not.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Darius Blaszijk wrote:
Hi there,
I have a console app that reads keys being pressed and then does some
action. In short it would be like this:
repeat
if fileage(myfile) imyfile then
begin
writeln('file changed');
imyfile := fileage(myfile);
end;
ch := readkey;
Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 19 Jun 2005, at 20:48, Marc Santhoff wrote:
how can I tell fpc to use only instructions supported on a specific
processor?
I'm compiling on an athlon for running on a geode (restriction has to
define instruction set from x686 to x586, I think).
In theory, the
Tomas Hajny wrote:
Date sent:Sun, 19 Jun 2005 22:49:44 +0200
From: Florian Klaempfl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: FPC-Pascal users discussions
fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] selecting target processor
Send reply
Pianoman wrote:
Hello everyone, I have got interesting results from my test of SSE2
switch.
I tested a small code fragment with and without SSE2 swith and I Saw no
difference.
Why is this?
Iused FPC 2.0 on WIN 32 to compile it with Best optimization
Code fragment follows:
{$fputype
Adrian Veith wrote:
It shows with useless code like simple nested for .. to loops, but also
with some more useful code like the attached RSA_Angriff from the C'T
magazine.
My results are with:
fpc -Sd -OG3rp3 -XX RSA_Angriff_D5.dpr
5266 ms
with:
fpc -Sd -XX RSA_Angriff_D5.dpr
Adrian Veith wrote:
Hi,
I am newbie with fpc (but not with pascal, which I use more than 20y now).
We have lot of existing delphi code, which some of it, I want to port to
new platforms - and fpc looks like the right tool for it. But I am
concerned about the speed. I did some basic
listmember wrote:
Jeff Pohlmeyer wrote:
To clarify, you can actually have many additional types between
the pointer type and the record definition, as long as you
don't introduce another section keyword that turns off
the current type section.
For instance, this will work:
type
listmember wrote:
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
It's simply the philosophy of pascal: things which need not to work
don't work. The extra type gives no gain, so why should be allowed?
I am not sure it is one of those things that need not work.
What would be the gain?
You could look
listmember wrote:
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
I am not sure it is one of those things that need not work.
What would be the gain?
Unless the compiler generates some sort of hint, or warning;
the loss (i.e. negative gain) is a needlesly confused developer.
No, he should simply know
Lance Boyle wrote:
Well--that's just lovely. How about getting this fixed? What other
surprises should I know about before using FPC?
I wonder how you can be suprised, it's perfectly documented:
http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/prog/progsu46.html#x53-510001.1.46
If you didn't use a Borland
Tony Pelton wrote:
I had it running in about 10 minutes.
I was blown away.
I'am also working at work daily with C++ but it can't beat the
productivity of pascal.
i'm not seeing anything right off that looks like a
nice,clean,portable little unit that would emulate what i might find
in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congratulations, and many thanks.
Will it compile itself ?
Yes, of course :)
Bob Martin
Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote the following on 16/05/05
10:17:46:
Hello,
The FPC team is pleased to announce the availability of version 2.0.0 of the
Free Pascal
Bob Barry wrote:
Michael -
On Sun, 8 May 2005 11:25 you wrote:
But ps and pdf still don't compile.
Strange, because I did a 'make alldist' yesterday and uploaded all
docs for the 2.0 release. All is committed and tagged.
Compilation of pdf and ps fail for me, but it looks like the
Marco van de Voort wrote:
Greenblatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have a problem with FreePascal 1.0.10 under SuSE 9.1. If I want to
compile source code, which makes use of the keyboard unit, I get the
following error message:
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lcurses
Pong(46) Error: Error while
Thomas Schatzl wrote:
Additionally if you examine code, _far_ the most applications do simple
forward (and maybe backward) iteration over a collection (also because
there are not that much collections where random access makes sense
runtime-wise).
There come a lot in my mind: e.g.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Florian Klaempfl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Personaly, I stopped carring (its been a week or two now, and I still
haven't
got the answer even where the problem lies)
Well, we try currently prepare 2.0 so the focus is currently on bug
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interfaces are part of 2.0 but mainly to be dephi compatible.
You mean that 20% of functionality of delphi interfaces that you currently
support?
Well, those 20% cover 80% of interface usage. The most important where
interfaces are used is COM importing and that
Thomas Schatzl wrote:
Hello,
I think I have to make some things more clear why I am in favor of
that foreach:
Thomas Schatzl schrieb:
Features being developed now are:
MI interfaces 90% (MI=multiple inheritance)
Inclasses 15% (embedded classes)
foreach 0% (well, we know you hate
Gergely MOLNAR wrote:
hi!
Anybody knows why fpc win32 IDE consumes much cpu time on windows me (and
also win xp).
At least for me it doesn't on XP and I never heard that it does on XP.
9x/ME is another story, the console implementation of 9x/ME is poor. I
think the best option for 9x/ME
ml wrote:
i included again my refcount patch (haven't got even a little response
on it. i'm slowly starting to wonder if i'm on the right mailing list
(usually devel list is for internal purposes of regular developers, and
others are... well,... for others (as well as bug reporting as
Mindaugas Indriunas wrote:
Hello.
I would like to understand better how the Lazarus Freepascal works.
Is there any free working software that is written purely in Lazarus
Freepascal,
Lazarus itself :)?
the sourcecode of which I could download and study?
Also, what reference Help
Raw Magick DOT COM wrote:
Hi All,
I see patches being released here, though I dont quite yet get how to
apply them, I have just downloaded source and make'd it using FPC. I
was wondering if these patches were automatically applied to that
evenings build of the sources and if not how often
Peter J. Haas wrote:
Hi Peter,
on 2005-03-25T19:37:02+02:00 Peter wrote:
I know. But why I should explain it more detailed, if you anyway
disapprove such suggestions. :-(
Most ppl want compatibility with Delphi. When we add a warning for
uninitialized var parameters then there will be a
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005, ml wrote:
On Sun, 2005-03-20 at 02:55 +0200, Nikolay Nikolov wrote:
ml wrote:
Other possibilities like ['?','%','$','|','','::','^'] were only named
under btw. (and how can btw. under question 2 become the main flaming
topic is out of my reason,
As you may have noticed, there is no 1.9.8 version for go32v2. The
reason is simply that the current fpc developers doesn't have enough
time to maintain the go32v2 port.
So my question is if anybody is willing to contribute/fix bugs of the
go32v2 port.
Carsten Bager wrote:
Hi
I have a problem with the following when I try to compile it
with the ppcrossarm compiler. This error dos not show when
I am doing a normal compile.
I have tried with version 1.9.4 and 1.9.9
Carsten
--
Program bb;
var
test:integer absolute 0030;
Begin
End.
chromdildo wrote:
Hello guys.
I don't want to annoy you again..
...but what's up with TThread ?
TThread.Synchronize(@myfunction); //simply doesn't call myfunction
I can call it directly but not via synchronize.
If not synchronized, gtk+ blows.
What am I doing wrong :(
You need to call
chromdildo wrote:
Hallo and thanks for the quick reply.
TThread.Synchronize(@myfunction); //simply doesn't call myfunction
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
You need to call CheckSynchronize in your main loop. However,
Sychronize is broken in the 1.9.8 release.
Will this get fixed until 2.0.0 ?
It's
Hello,
The Free Pascal Team is pleased to announce that FPC version 1.9.8
(or 2.0.0-RC2) is available and ready for download.
This is a pre-release of version 2.0. As such, it is considered a beta of
the upcoming 2.0 release, which is expected to be released in a few weeks.
While this is
Simon Kissel wrote:
[Sorry, didn't notice reply-to is set to sender and not the list here]
Skybuck,
thanks for the detailed guide. However, it was simpler than that...
with the help from the guys at #fpc, I got
ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/contrib/cross/mingw/mingwcross.zip
Unzipped that to
If you want as much as possible delphi compatibility and a delphi styled
environment, use lazarus: www.lazarus.freepascal.org .
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
This my test to see if free pascal can be used to compile Delphi Projects.
I have thousands of delphi projects/project files etc... but for
Henri Gourvest wrote:
I'm trying to compile on suse 9.2 but when I use the dl unit and the
cthreads unit the linker don't work.
it can't find -ldl.
I've tryed to use this compiler options without success:
{$IFDEF FPC}
{$IFDEF UNIX}
{$IFNDEF BSD}
{$linklib dl}{$ENDIF}
{$linklib crypt}
Though arm/linux didn't make it in 1.9.6, I built a new cross snapshot,
you can get it here:
ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/snapshot/beta/arm-linux/arm-linux-fpc.i386-linux.tar.gz
More info how to use it can be found here:
http://www.freepascal.org/wiki/index.php/Setup_Cross_Compile_For_ARM
Marcus Roeckrath wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hallo Marco,
Am Dienstag, 4. Januar 2005 08:22 schrieb Marco van de Voort:
Oldlinux is x86 only. It is one of the reasons why it was abandoned.
OK, I have begun to rewrite my older i386 (fpc 1.0) pascal sources. I found
some other
Marcus Roeckrath wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hi,
why is there no oldlinux unit in the x86_64 port? I found one in the x386
version of fpc.
oldlinux is from 1.0.x times and full of i386 specific code and
definitions that's why it was named oldlinux :)
I need f. e. the GetDate and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am new to Windows programming so please bear with me if it is some trivial mistake.
I have created a window with :
hWindow := CreateWindow (AppName,'First Prog',ws_OverlappedWindow or WS_VScroll,
cw_UseDefault,cw_UseDefault,cw_UseDefault,
Bartek wrote:
hi,
i'm trying to get this piece of code to work. but it fails on execution and
returns a SIGSEV signal. i think this is caused by the weird code, fpc
creates. fpc tryed to access the wide sse registers with multiple short
32bit registers, and at some point, protected memory is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) This is not Delphi/Kylix compatible (just try to compile Qt.pas)
This is known, but is unfortunately unavoidable. Delphi/Kylix uses an
internal linker and can therefore solve this problem. FPC has to use an
external linker, and therefore the assembler label must be
Den Jean wrote:
On Tuesday 23 November 2004 11:13 am, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
* dynamic arrays : TIntArray = array of integer.
On Intel it works fine but on arm not.
Bindhelp.pas provides TIntArray pascal helper functions to the binding that
is written in C++
eg. this C-code copies
Den Jean wrote:
On Sunday 21 November 2004 11:41 pm, Den Jean wrote:
I also debugged it on the zaurus with gdb.
I debugged somewhat more and this learned me that the record Method
is passed by reference instead of by value as it should.
With a little hack I managed to force a call by value.
Karim Forsthofer wrote:
Hello
I`m looking for the orginal sources of the fpc ncurses bindings from Michael Van Canneyt. Only the compiled file is included in the fpc installation.
I`ve try to download packages.zip (from http://www.freepascal.org/develop.html), but the links on this site and on
David Emerson wrote:
I don't know if there are any speed considerations.
No, there aren't any except longer compile times ;)
___
fpc-pascal maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Den Jean wrote:
On Sunday 07 November 2004 04:30 am, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Before I can test it, I've to reinstall my Zaurus, when updating to
3.5.1, the installation got broken :/
It is time to reinstall your Zaurus.
Hopefully, I'll get the new (and bigger ;)) SD card today so I can
The first x86-64/linux snapshot has been uploaded.
As you can see from the regression test results, the compiler is very
stable already:
http://www.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/testsuite.cgi?TESTOS=0TESTCPU=7TESTVERSION=0TESTDATE=
(i386 for comparison:
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
The first x86-64/linux snapshot has been uploaded.
Maybe I should post a download link as well :) :
ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/snapshot/v19/linux-x86_64/fpc-1.9.5.x86_64.tar.gz
___
fpc-pascal maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED
Mark Emerson wrote:
Can anyone give an estimate of how many FPC users there are now,
worldwide? I'm not certain how to define this, but would like to get a
feeling. One metric might be the number of downloads of various
versions. Another might be the size of this email list. My gratitude
Den Jean wrote:
On Friday 22 October 2004 04:22 pm, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
The official way is to do use -XP:
ppcarm -XParm-linux- hello
and install the arm-linux-as and arm-linux-ld into e.g. /usr/local/bin
Nice. Webpage has been updated.
What about putting these information into the fpc wiki
Den Jean wrote:
On Thursday 21 October 2004 06:02 pm, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
* Does anyone have a working ARM snapshot ?
ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/fpc/snapshot/v19/linux-arm/fpc-1.9.3.arm.tar
Hi
Thanks.
It works fine with the snapshot you pointed out.
For a report see :
http://users.pandora.be
Den Jean wrote:
Hi,
Cross-compile for ARM:
==
I'd like to develop an application on Zaurus (arm) with FPC,
but I do not manage to create a cross-compile setup.
Qt/Embedded binding for FPC:
==
I already created a binding for FPC to Qt/Embedded that works
with libqte
Marc Santhoff wrote:
Am Do, den 14.10.2004 schrieb Peter Vreman um 07:49:
[..]
Correct
Wow, the shortest possible answer. :)
No
___
fpc-pascal maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Jilani Khaldi wrote:
Hi All,
In the next issue of LinuxC n.42 (http://www.oltrelinux.com) there will
be the first article (Special) about Free Pascal (8 pages for this
article, never happened before with other cool languages). LinuxC is
the number one magazione in Italy dedicated to Linux with
Alan Mead wrote:
It's known that Randomize() is not effective when called rapidly... I
tried to solve this using the code sample below. I can cat /dev/null
(without becoming root) but when I run the code below I get an access
denied RTE at 'Reset(f,1);'.. this code works fine when run as
Peter Vreman wrote:
Hi,
At first: Don't get me wrong and expect anything, I'm only curious.
That said:
How much work would it be to port fpc to another processor?
Same for another OS?
Maybe some of the experienced folks can give a short sketch in a few
sentences of the process of porting.
Porting
Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 1 sep 2004, at 00:13, Jeff Weeks wrote:
I tried the SDL4Freepascal headers and they seem to work. Just can't
see how to display text. And they don't appear to work on Macintosh.
JEDI-SDL supposedly works on a modified version of Freepascal on a Mac.
Any Mac people out
Marco van de Voort wrote:
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 15:27:43 +0200 (CEST), Marco van de Voort wrote
I was thinking about a simple global file with libnames and weights,
with a possibility to override on the commandline.
Simple, generic, and configurable.
This doesn't look very transparent to me
Zhang Zheng wrote:
My operating system is Windows 98. I found that the Win32 Version of F.P runs much
slower than DOS Version, no matter compiling or typing in programs.What cause this
difference? The Memory?
Except for the compiling mode and memory parametres, are there any other greatest
Jeff Weeks wrote:
Do I really need to use vgalib under linux?
It depends what you want to do?
I'm having a hard time
finding a supported graphics card. Is it true that only a handful of
chipsets are supported? Any way to use the X graphics rather than vgalib?
Can't get graphics to work on
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 00:11:16 +0200 Jonas Maebe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 14 aug 2004, at 19:34, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
How can I convert between PowerPC double and i386 Extended on a
powerpc?
For example: I want to save a Double under powerpc to a stream as i386
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
I suggest to reverse the byte at the PPC side, and to stream the
doubles to the i386 box, and to assign the double there to an extended
variable. In this case there is no need for a special conversion
routine between double and extended since this is handled by the
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 12:27:10 +0200 Florian Klaempfl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
I suggest to reverse the byte at the PPC side, and to stream the
doubles to the i386 box, and to assign the double there to an extended
variable. In this case
Matt Emson wrote:
I don't like the very unspecific implementation. In [SNIP, as this is a
matter of opinion, replace this with other]
That's what I meant however my keyboard ate it ;)
languages/libraries there are several kinds of iterators, see e.g. the
STL.
Exactly, which is why I prefer the
Matt Emson wrote:
Is it allowed for D9 win32 target?
We'll have to wait for BorCon04.
If it is .not only, see the .NET faq item.
But it *is* a fairly standard concept (foreach is the widely used
keyword..). It *will* arrive in Win32 at some point (if another Win32
version is released) and so
501 - 600 of 638 matches
Mail list logo
