On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Lukasz Stafiniak wrote:
>
> Wow, I didn't know about that! Still, it is not clear to me it is a
> good thing to capture "var" variables in the closure. It goes against
> the semantics of normal nested functions. It's a "dirty
Why are type-parametric definitions called generics in Pascal? It
seems to me their semantics is like templates in C++, not like
generics in Java/C# (or ML languages).
Regards.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.free
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Sven Barth
wrote:
> Am 28.02.2012 20:31, schrieb Lukasz Stafiniak:
>>
>> (1) A declaration part, that parallels "var", with keyword "val" or
>> "let" (since "val" is taken up by a procedure). It introd
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Noah Silva
wrote:
>
> If you want to convince people to use FPC and are having issues, you should
> ask them what features, exactly, they are looking for. Chances are that FPC
> has them. (If they want a functional language, though, then you're out of
> luck).
P
