everything you've all built.
--
Zoë Peterson
Scooter Software
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
ntroducing another view in the hierarchy, keep the code cleaner, and
be easier to disable if MACOS_MINIMUM_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET < 10.10.
I should be able to make it work with composition and re-parenting
things when necessary, but there will be a lot more management code, so
I thought I'd a
I'm assuming it's just not
implemented. Is that something that could be supported? Would it be
difficult to do so? Are there any existing Objective Pascal specific
tricks I could use to avoid duplicating all of the fields/code?
Thanks!
Zoë Peterson
Scooter Software
Ryan,
Do you have a link to the LSP discord channel? I tried following the
one you posted Friday, but I got an error that I either didn't have
access to any text channels or there weren't any on the server.
Thanks!
On 4/27/2020 10:12 AM, Ryan Joseph via fpc-pascal wrote:
On Apr 26, 2020
osoft implementation.
That seems like a reasonable restriction to me. Needing the actual
system uptime is going to be a much rarer than profiling or checking
elapsed times, and supporting that aspect would be in conflict with
making the function low overhead.
--
Zoë Peterson
Scooter Sof
he headers too.
Thanks!
--
Zoë Peterson
Scooter Software
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
specially if you're doing extensive
multithreading. We've been using FastMM with FPC on macOS and Linux for
about 4 years now and are very happy with it.
--
Zoë Peterson
Scooter Software
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
, but we've only had
objectivec1 enabled and our 64-bit builds appear to be working without
issue?
--
Zoë Peterson
Scooter Software
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinf
Has anyone had any contact with Blaise Thorne in the past couple of
months? In mid-March he told me he would have an updated version of the
closure branch ready in a couple of days and then went silent. I only
have his email address and haven't been able to get a response.
Thanks
behavior when leaving the current scope. Barry Kelly has one example on
his blog where he talks about implementing C++'s RAII using it:
http://blog.barrkel.com/2010/01/one-liner-raii-in-delphi.html
Is Free Pascal's behavior intentional? Can it be changed to match Delphi?
a second
connection to the server.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1699145/what-is-the-difference-between-active-and-passive-ftp#1699163
--
Zoë Peterson
Scooter Software
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http
is items with improvements/problems ?
No, though I’ll try to submit some for the cases where there could be
improvement.
The only thing I can think of that would have been retroactively useful is if
Libc.pas had included deprecated declarations with messages saying where the
replacement units/me
r Delphi's new
Posix.*.pas APIs has definitely been an annoying pain point.
--
Zoë Peterson
Scooter Software
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
13 matches
Mail list logo