Hi,
I'm receiving unsolicited spam messages along with the normal message on this
list. Is this happening to anyone else?
The email address I use here is for the sole purpose of this subscription.
Nino
___
fpc-pascal maillist -
On Saturday 21 November 2009 08:56:53 Martin Schreiber wrote:
On Friday 20 November 2009 21:24:17 Jorge Aldo G. de F. Junior wrote:
arent there a /dev/something device for pcspeaker ?
/dev/pcspkr
With X11 one can use xbell().
Martin
___
On Wednesday 11 November 2009 09:22:30 Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Flávio Etrusco wrote:
Graeme, I guess the OP didn't want to reintroduce the 'Create'
constructor with lower visibility, just implement a second constructor
with private visiblity.
It can be useful when implementing singletons
Hi,
FPC 2.2.4 refers.
Two of the four hint directives listed on page 11 of the Reference Guide for
Free Pascal, version 2.2.4 don't work as described in the manual.
The Experimental directive causes the compiler to stop with a syntax error.
The example program listed on page 11 doesn't compile
Hi Guys,
With reference to FPC 2.2.4 Linux, can somebody please explain how to get the
compiler to compile code that uses the Experimental and Unimplemented hint
directives?
An expanation is given on their use on page 11 of the Reference Guide for Free
Pascal, version 2.2.4, but I have no
On Saturday 31 October 2009 10:51:24 fpcl...@silvermono.co.za wrote:
Hi Guys,
With reference to FPC 2.2.4 Linux, can somebody please explain how to get
the compiler to compile code that uses the Experimental and Unimplemented
hint directives?
An expanation is given on their use on page 11
Hi Guys,
The Linux tthread.inc file in FPC 2.2.4 refers:
There is a constant array defined at line 55 that lists 'priority' values
which I think are inverted. i.e. Currently, the listed values range from -20
to +19 and these map to tpIdle to tpRealtime. According to man nice(1),
Nicenesses
2009/10/20 fpcl...@silvermono.co.za:
The comment on line 54 should perhaps be reworded to reflect that
although it's not implemented in the current release, the user is free to
use the values if he so wishes. It's not stupid, one never knows what the
next guy will do with ones code.
It
Hi Guys,
Have you considered implementing the foreach construct similar to that found
in many modern languages?
Regards,
Nino
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Hi,
According to the note in chapter 2, section 2.2.1 of the FPC Programmer's
Guide, it is not possible for conditionals to be exported to other units.
Is there a way around this?
My Ref:
Programmer's Guide for Free Pascal, Version 2.2.2
Document version 2.0
June 2008
Regards,
Nino
Did you copy the extJS files in the www root of your server?
The directory must be named ext (without qoutes)
Regards
//---
On Monday 28 September 2009 09:57:34 yu ping wrote:
thanks,
I successfully compile the program,and install the fastcgi on Appache,
but when I
It's better to post your ExtPascal related questions on the ExtPascal Forum.
Read the wiki start at
http://code.google.com/p/extpascal/wiki/GettingStarted
ExtPascal generates its units from ExtJS html docs.
Regards
//---
While scanning /proc may not be portable, the question asked is about checking
for a running Linux process. The only way I know is scanning all directories
within /proc (which as you all know are the id's of the running processes)
and checking for the process file name and the process command
On Thursday 18 June 2009 08:51:13 Vincent Snijders wrote:
Graeme Geldenhuys schreef:
Hi,
Recently I learned that you can have writeable typed constants. That
sounds rather like an oxymoron to my. Writeable constants make no sense,
is that then simply a variable? What is the use of a
On Thursday 18 June 2009 10:48:57 Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
I don't know (have not tested) what FPC does with mode delphi though.
But seeing that this feature is just for backward compatibility, maybe
it should be disallowed by default in mode objfpc as well?
It also works in Delphi mode.
It's intersting to note that as far back as Delphi 5,(oldest I have on my
system), attempting to write to a typed constant causes a left side cannot
be assigned to compiler error.
I guess as long as FPC compiler offers TP7 compatibility, this feature must be
retained. Also, bear in mind that
Hi guys,
I'm interested in exploring the USB interface from within Linux using FPC.
I have looked at libusb and am aware of the functionality which it exposes.
I would appreciate it if someone with USB programming experience could help by
pointing me to a website or documentation that reveals
Thank you.
Regards,
Nino
/---
On Monday 15 June 2009 17:15:40 Johann Glaser wrote:
Hi!
Some time ago I did header translations for it. I'll attach it
(libusb.pas) plus some utilities and a class wrapper (usbutil.pas),...
Bye
Hansi
On Thursday 11 June 2009 08:49:03 fpcl...@silvermono.co.za wrote:
Hi Guys,
Assuming that a FPC RTL rebuild has succeeded, can somebody please describe
the process of rebuilding Lazarus and the LCL using the new FPC RTL?
Regards,
Nino
As the saying goes Assumption is the mother of all
On Thursday 11 June 2009 10:05:47 Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Assuming that a FPC RTL rebuild has succeeded, can somebody please
describe the process of rebuilding Lazarus and the LCL using the new FPC
RTL?
Load your previous Lazarus IDE. Then do: Tools Build Lazarus
This only works if
On Thursday 11 June 2009 12:49:40 Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
I often make changes to the RTL and FCL. Many of my packages which are
compiled into the Lazarus IDE depend on the FCL. I also use Linux and
this process works perfectly for me.
I'm off to a meeting. Will try later today.
Thanks
Hi guys,
strict is introduced for new delphi compatibility?
A most welcome addition.
I'm ashamed to admit that I only found out that it's been included in FPC
today. I ran an old VM which has FPC ver 2.2.2 installed, and strict is
supported! I'm currenly using FPC 2.2.5
What other jewels
Excellent explanation.
Thanks Martin.
Regards,
Nino
//***
On Monday 08 June 2009 20:33:48 Martin Friebe wrote:
fpcl...@silvermono.co.za
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
On Sunday 07 June 2009 22:19:47 Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 07 Jun 2009, at 10:35, fpcl...@silvermono.co.za wrote:
A high level, a class is like a record that has been modified to
include
functions and procedures. I know that I'm over simplifying thing
here, please
bare with me.
The
On Monday 08 June 2009 19:55:00 Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hi Nino,
Can you please refrain from quoting the *whole* previous message, when your
reply only relates to one or two lines. If other developers want to read
the whole context of the message thread they can look in their email
history
Hi Jonas
Thanks for the reply.
A high level, a class is like a record that has been modified to include
functions and procedures. I know that I'm over simplifying thing here, please
bare with me.
I'm trying to understand the logic employed by the creators of Delphi where
they don't allow to
Hi Guys,
Is there a reason why the following code fails to compile in Delphi but
compile in FPC? Could the reason be that FPC allows the use of global
properties? Tested with Delphi 5 and up.
The Delphi compiler complains about the lines:
TestClass.TestRec.X := 10;
TestClass.TestRec.Y := 20;
Hi guys
In MS Windows I use the following API functions:
1/
SetDIBits(bmap.Canvas.Handle, bmap.Handle, 0, bmap.Height, data,
PBitmapInfo(bitmapInfop)^, DIB_RGB_COLORS);
To set the pixels in a bitmap (bmap) using the colour data found in the
specified device-independent bitmap
I must agree with Michael.
In my experience, it doesn't matter where the findclose() is placed, as long
as it's called within the scope of the findfirst(), findnext(). If
findclose() is not called, all that happens is that the OS will use up file
handles, which are finite in quantity on any
Does anyone have experience in developing PostgreSQL server side functions
using fpc?
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Hi guys
Tinkering with Findfirst, Findnext functions within Linux, I discovered that
the file attribute pointing to the parent dir and the curent dir (. + ..) are
missing from filutilh.inc - Am I looking in the wrong place?
I found that the following works;
procedure Test();
const
On Sunday 10 May 2009 11:03:00 Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, fpcl...@silvermono.co.za said:
Are there replacements for the deprecated CreateShellArgV and
FreeShellArgV functions and procedure that are currently defined in
genfuncs.inc?
Not currently. What do you need
On Sunday 10 May 2009 12:11:55 Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Sun, 10 May 2009, fpcl...@silvermono.co.za wrote:
Hi guys
Tinkering with Findfirst, Findnext functions within Linux, I discovered
that the file attribute pointing to the parent dir and the curent dir (.
+ ..) are missing from
Hi Graeme
You have a point.
About two months ago, I had to visit the dentist because one of my filings was
playing up. The diagnosis was that an old silver filing was leaking and
needed to be replaced. Becase of all the hype about mercury poisoning caused
by silver filings (which from my
According to the FPC rtl.pdf version 2.2.2 Doc version 2.1 of June 2008, page
165, states, and I quote: Description:FPSelect checks one of the file
descriptors in the FDSets to see if its status changed.
//-
On Saturday 09
Hi guys
Are there replacements for the deprecated CreateShellArgV and FreeShellArgV
functions and procedure that are currently defined in genfuncs.inc?
Regards
Nino
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
Have you considered using XML to represent and structure your data?
If you must do it with TStringList, you could declare a dynamic array of
TStringList and instantiate the array elements at will at runtime. Also, each
string entry in the TStringList can hold a pointer to any object that you
If you're looking for a GUI IDE, try the Lazarus IDE. I use FPC extensively to
code Linux libs and console applications. I use Lazarus as my editor/IDE, it
has all I need and more.
Give it a try.
http://www.lazarus.freepaascal.org
Nino
//**
On
Doug, Hi
Thanks for the welcome.
As a veteran Turbo Pascal user, (since ver 3.0 in 1986), I was introduced to
Object Pascal in 1989 when I upgraded to TP ver 5.5, although it was quite
different to Object Pascal we use today. BTW, I still sort of know my way
around Turbo Vision.
I've been
39 matches
Mail list logo
