On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 03:09:07PM +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Dennis wrote:
I wrote a free pascal program in ubuntu Linux and wanted to deploy
it to run in a netgear router through open router firmware
OpenWrt.
To test it, I copied the program into a OpenWrt virtualbox virtual
machine
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 09:23:29AM +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Sven Barth wrote:
An llvm target will move the optimisation burden away from fpc, which
would be very interesting.
While we would welcome a LLVM backend it is basically a consent in
the development team that this would
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 11:23:42AM +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Patrick wrote:
I fell in love with Ada about 14 months ago. Including the
cardboard box, i now have 53lbs of Ada books(A few still to read),
I am planning on diving into Pascal in this way too and I want to
mix Ada and
Starting at $1795
Intel/AMD only.
Nope!
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 06:20:29PM +0100, Reinier Olislagers wrote: > Has anybody tried the Pathscale debugger on Linux x64/FreeBSD? > > I haven't myself, just heard that they open sourced their compiler suite. > > A download page seems to be here: >
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 07:57:09PM +0100, Jonas Maebe wrote: > > On 10 Nov 2012, at 19:38, microc...@zoho.com wrote: > > > On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 06:20:29PM +0100, Reinier Olislagers wrote: > >> Has anybody tried the Pathscale debugger on Linux x64/FreeBSD? > >> > >> I haven't myself, just
Is anybody else receiving mailformed emails from the list?
I've received several, most or all from Marco, with all with most of the
headers appearing as text since there is an extra blank line between the
X-Mailer header and the previous ones.
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 14:29:15 +0200 (CEST)
wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 01:15:09PM +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
microc...@zoho.com wrote:
Is anybody else receiving mailformed emails from the list?
I've received several, most or all from Marco, with all with most of the
headers appearing as text since there is an extra blank line
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 03:20:15PM +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
microc...@zoho.com wrote:
I note that the headers you quote include a few X- headers that I
don't see here:
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
X-BeenThere: fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:20:34AM +0200, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
On 15-8-2012 10:08, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
Am Wednesday 15 August 2012 09:59:00 schrieb Lukasz Sokol:
On 15/08/2012 08:33, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
Am Wednesday 15 August 2012 03:52:00 schrieb waldo kitty:
the loading
Thanks Mark. I haven't gotten to my SPARC boxes yet. Since I already had a copy
of 2.6.0 built on my Linux box I was playing around with building there first.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Morgan Lloyd markmll.fpc-pas...@telemetry.co.uk
Sender: fpc-pascal-boun...@lists.freepascal.org
On Tue, 22 May 2012 10:29:28 +0200 Sven Barth pascaldra...@googlemail.com
wrote:
This might be, because you compiled it without a libgdb which in turn is
the one who links dynamically to libc. Most FPC applications (if they
don't use threads or a WideString manager) don't require libc and thus
It seems I have to post twice or nothing shows up to the list!
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
On Fri, 11 May 2012 13:59:42 +0200 Sven Barth wrote:
Am 11.05.2012 11:29, schrieb microcode
On Thu, 10 May 2012 17:14:45 + Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
You might find the fpc-devel mailing list interesting, although I think
that everybody would admit that there is a shortage of documentation
On Wed, 9 May 2012 21:05:56 +0200 Ludo Brands wrote:
In any case, 2.6.0 is needed now to build 2.7.1. Just rebuild 2.7.1 from
today on Solaris 10 Intel and it failed miserably with 2.4.4. That worked
a few months ago and the 2.7.1 then build doesn't build todays 2.7.1
neither. Only 2.6.0
On Wed, 09 May 2012 19:45:11 + Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
One thing I would stress for the OP's benefit: SPARC 2.6.0 was entirely
able to build itself and Lazarus. It's only when I tried mixing database
access and some heavy floating-point astronomical calculations that the
problems became
On Wed, 09 May 2012 18:18:59 + Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
My main role is being a thorn in the side of the core developers when
something stops working :-) However I've previously offered to host a
(not very fast) system here for compilation etc., and the offer stands.
What SPARC box(es) do
I screwed up the quoting here, sorry. Jeff didn't write all below, I think
some of it was Mark.
On Wed, 09 May 2012 18:01:43 -0400 Jeff Wormsley wrote:
And what, pray, is wrong with Slackware? :-)
Nothing :-) Once you Slack you never go back!
Most of the SPARC systems around here are Debian
On Thu, 10 May 2012 07:27:22 + Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
microcode wrote:
What SPARC box(es) do you have? I may be able to host Solaris
development systems if needed although the SPARC stuff would have to be
scheduled since I cannot leave them on all the time because of the huge
On Thu, 10 May 2012 07:32:47 + Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
How many sockets do you have on your E4500?
12, i.e. space for an I/O card and internal discs for booting.
Woohoo! That's a lot of CPUs. I'll bet you can heat your home with that in
the winter.
I prefer the SS1000 architecture,
On Thu, 10 May 2012 14:07:47 +0200 (CEST) Tomas Hajny wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2012 13:22, microcode wrote:
Sun makes awfully nice boxes and Solaris is a very nice development
platform. I hope the guys will keep FPC going on Solaris. There are
many Solaris 10 on Sun fans.
FPC support
Hi, I was looking to try FPC but I saw the latest release isn't available for
Solaris, only 2.4something. Do you guys plan on releasing the new version on
Solaris? Do you intend to keep supporting Solaris?
___
fpc-pascal maillist -
Sorry if this is a duplicate. I sent it from my phone yesterday but it has
not shown up yet, possibly due to the html issue.
I was looking to try FPC and I downloaded the Linux version. I saw the
latest release isn't available for Solaris.
Do you guys plan on releasing the 2.6.0 version on
On Wed, 9 May 2012 17:19:59 +0200
Ludo Brands ludo.bra...@free.fr wrote:
Hi, I was looking to try FPC but I saw the latest release
isn't available for Solaris, only 2.4something. Do you guys
plan on releasing the new version on Solaris? Do you intend
to keep supporting Solaris?
From: Tomas Hajny
Do you guys plan on releasing the 2.6.0 version on Solaris and is there
a timeframe? Do you plan on continuing to support Solaris? I would be
interested in running both the Intel and SPARC versions if they come
available.
I'm not the right one to answer this question but
On Wed, 09 May 2012 16:10:06 + Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
There is a directory for Solaris SPARC but it is empty. Is it possible
to get 2.6.0 for Solaris SPARC? Thanks again.
I've got a copy that I've built and run here, but I started off with an
earlier version and had to jump through a
On Wed, 9 May 2012 18:44:08 +0200 Jonas Maebe wrote:
There is no real Solaris maintainer. Pierre sometimes works on it and I
run nightly Solaris/SPARC regression tests (for as long as I still have
access to a Solaris/SPARC machine), but I definitely do not support the
platform. Solaris/SPARC
On Wed, 9 May 2012 19:02:16 +0200 (CEST) Tomas Hajny wrote:
My point was that there has been no official / dedicated maintainer for
that platform within the core team recently which is the reason why there
are no official builds for Solaris for version 2.6.0. Mark Morgan Lloyd
who already
27 matches
Mail list logo
