2007/1/26, Carlo Kok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Alexandre Leclerc wrote:
> 2007/1/26, Carlo Kok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>> >
>> > On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, Alexandre Leclerc wrote:
>> >
>> >> 2007/1/25, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> >>> On 1/25/07, Alexand
Alexandre Leclerc wrote:
2007/1/26, Carlo Kok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
> On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, Alexandre Leclerc wrote:
>
>> 2007/1/25, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> On 1/25/07, Alexandre Leclerc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, I understand t
2007/1/26, Carlo Kok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
> On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, Alexandre Leclerc wrote:
>
>> 2007/1/25, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> On 1/25/07, Alexandre Leclerc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, I understand that, but I *need* a scriptin
On 26 jan 2007, at 12:51, Carlo Kok wrote:
* FPC has changed default calling convention once (or twice?)
Once afaaik.
* The way "register" works on FPC is slightly different from
delphi, in delphi special types like interfaces, strings and
variant results are passed as var parameters, it
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, Alexandre Leclerc wrote:
2007/1/25, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 1/25/07, Alexandre Leclerc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, I understand that, but I *need* a scripting engine which is based
on Pascal. And ROPS is the only
2007/1/25, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, Alexandre Leclerc wrote:
> 2007/1/25, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On 1/25/07, Alexandre Leclerc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Yes, I understand that, but I *need* a scripting engine which is ba
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, Alexandre Leclerc wrote:
> 2007/1/25, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On 1/25/07, Alexandre Leclerc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Yes, I understand that, but I *need* a scripting engine which is based
> > > on Pascal. And ROPS is the only one I found
2007/1/25, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 1/25/07, Alexandre Leclerc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, I understand that, but I *need* a scripting engine which is based
> on Pascal. And ROPS is the only one I found that answered my
> requirements. Also, it's integrated and it
On 1/25/07, Alexandre Leclerc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, I understand that, but I *need* a scripting engine which is based
on Pascal. And ROPS is the only one I found that answered my
requirements. Also, it's integrated and it's "free", and very fast.
If there was another way, I would use i
On 25 jan 2007, at 16:05, Alexandre Leclerc wrote:
I understand that this is not true for the way ROPS has been
implemented, but that is a (major) downside of implementing things at
such a low level. No approach is without its downsides...
Yes, I understand that, but I *need* a scripting engi
2007/1/25, Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 25 jan 2007, at 14:44, Alexandre Leclerc wrote:
> Are there plans to set the param-stack the same order as Delphi or
> will the actual code always stay like that?
There are plans to change it to be Delphi compatible.
> (I ask, because from differ
On 25 jan 2007, at 14:44, Alexandre Leclerc wrote:
Are there plans to set the param-stack the same order as Delphi or
will the actual code always stay like that?
There are plans to change it to be Delphi compatible.
(I ask, because from different FPC release, ROPS always react
differently.
I did try a latest version and I think there was no changes on that. (?)
Are there plans to set the param-stack the same order as Delphi or
will the actual code always stay like that?
(I ask, because from different FPC release, ROPS always react
differently. So I know some things are changing in
2007/1/23, Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Daniël Mantione schrieb:
>
> Op Tue, 23 Jan 2007, schreef Alexandre Leclerc:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I saw some time ago in a roadmap for the next version (1.2?) - that I
>> can't find anymore - a point about being compatible with Dephi calling
>> regis
Daniël Mantione schrieb:
Op Tue, 23 Jan 2007, schreef Alexandre Leclerc:
Hi all,
I saw some time ago in a roadmap for the next version (1.2?) - that I
can't find anymore - a point about being compatible with Dephi calling
register... And I was wondering if anything has changed in FPC
regardin
Op Tue, 23 Jan 2007, schreef Alexandre Leclerc:
> Hi all,
>
> I saw some time ago in a roadmap for the next version (1.2?) - that I
> can't find anymore - a point about being compatible with Dephi calling
> register... And I was wondering if anything has changed in FPC
> regarding this?
>
> (B
Hi all,
I saw some time ago in a roadmap for the next version (1.2?) - that I
can't find anymore - a point about being compatible with Dephi calling
register... And I was wondering if anything has changed in FPC
regarding this?
(Because I use ROPS and there are issues because it is different fro
17 matches
Mail list logo
