Re: [fpc-pascal] Alternative to generic advanced records

2012-02-07 Thread Paul Ishenin
08.02.12 2:52, Kornel Kisielewicz пишет: Ok, advanced records in 2.6.0 are it seems buggy as hell (with optimizations on), so I'm searching for an alternative. For the simple case objects work quite well, but for generics I have a problem. That's why it is always good to test FPC trunk versions

Re: [fpc-pascal] Alternative to generic advanced records

2012-02-07 Thread Sven Barth
On 07.02.2012 19:52, Kornel Kisielewicz wrote: Ok, advanced records in 2.6.0 are it seems buggy as hell (with optimizations on), so I'm searching for an alternative. For the simple case objects work quite well, but for generics I have a problem. This is part of the code: generic TGVector3 =

[fpc-pascal] Alternative to generic advanced records

2012-02-07 Thread Kornel Kisielewicz
Ok, advanced records in 2.6.0 are it seems buggy as hell (with optimizations on), so I'm searching for an alternative. For the simple case objects work quite well, but for generics I have a problem. This is part of the code: generic TGVector3 = packed record {... types} public class funct