On Sat, 8 Aug 2015, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 2015-08-08 10:13, Jonas Maebe wrote:
The problem with this is that if you don't specify a license, the
default in copyright law is that no one is allowed to do anything
with your work without explicit permission from you
Correct, and which actu
Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 08 Aug 2015, at 10:04, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
I fundamentally do not believe in licenses. Not even free ones.
Hence I specify none for the docs.
The problem with this is that if you don't specify a license, the default in
copyright law is that no one is allowed to
Jonas Maebe
writes:
> As the saying goes: reality is that which, when you stop believing in
> it, doesn't go away...
(un)Fortunately. ;)
Sincerely,
Gour
--
As a blazing fire turns firewood to ashes, O Arjuna, so does the
fire of knowledge burn to ashes all reactions to material activities.
On 08/08/15 11:21, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
> If you believe in copyright law, yes. I don't believe in that either.
As the saying goes: reality is that which, when you stop believing in
it, doesn't go away...
> PS. And anyway: the whole discussion is moot. The latex files do contain
> some k
On 2015-08-08 10:13, Jonas Maebe wrote:
> The problem with this is that if you don't specify a license, the
> default in copyright law is that no one is allowed to do anything
> with your work without explicit permission from you
Correct, and which actually applies a lot of restriction.
I've bee
On Sat, 8 Aug 2015, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 08 Aug 2015, at 10:04, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
I fundamentally do not believe in licenses. Not even free ones.
Hence I specify none for the docs.
The problem with this is that if you don't specify a license, the default
in copyright law is th
On 08 Aug 2015, at 10:04, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> I fundamentally do not believe in licenses. Not even free ones.
>
> Hence I specify none for the docs.
The problem with this is that if you don't specify a license, the default in
copyright law is that no one is allowed to do anything wit
Michael Van Canneyt
writes:
> I fundamentally do not believe in licenses. Not even free ones.
>
> Hence I specify none for the docs.
Ehh, I like this one…when considering to write something, it’s
cumbersome that one has to think about licenses, law etc…
However, it’s nice one is not alone. ;)
On Fri, 7 Aug 2015, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hi,
Just curious, what is FPC's documentation license? At moment it seems
like it doesn't specify any all - which might not be a good idea. I
looked in the fpcdocs repository and in all the generated PDF's.
Normally open source projects specify a
Hi,
Just curious, what is FPC's documentation license? At moment it seems
like it doesn't specify any all - which might not be a good idea. I
looked in the fpcdocs repository and in all the generated PDF's.
Normally open source projects specify a GNU Free Documentation License
v1.3 or something l
10 matches
Mail list logo
