Hi,
When calling fpc -d foo test.pas there are two mistakes:
First the -d parameter is missing a value, which fpc silently ignores.
And second there are two files to compile. FPC ignores that too, gives
a hint, but compiles anyway.
Design or bug?
Mattias
On 24 Sep 2013, at 14:17, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
When calling fpc -d foo test.pas there are two mistakes:
First the -d parameter is missing a value, which fpc silently ignores.
And second there are two files to compile. FPC ignores that too, gives
a hint, but compiles anyway.
Design or bug?
Am 24.09.2013 14:17, schrieb Mattias Gaertner:
Hi,
When calling fpc -d foo test.pas there are two mistakes:
First the -d parameter is missing a value, which fpc silently ignores.
And second there are two files to compile. FPC ignores that too, gives
a hint, but compiles anyway.
Design or bug?
On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 14:23:52 +0200
Jonas Maebe jonas.ma...@elis.ugent.be wrote:
On 24 Sep 2013, at 14:17, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
When calling fpc -d foo test.pas there are two mistakes:
First the -d parameter is missing a value, which fpc silently ignores.
And second there are two
On 24 Sep 2013, at 14:34, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 14:23:52 +0200
Jonas Maebe jonas.ma...@elis.ugent.be wrote:
By design, FPC gives a warning (not a hint) when two file names are
specified.
You are right, it is a warning.
Why not an error?
FPC used to silently ignore
On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 14:28:42 +0200
Sven Barth pascaldra...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 24.09.2013 14:17, schrieb Mattias Gaertner:
Hi,
When calling fpc -d foo test.pas there are two mistakes:
First the -d parameter is missing a value, which fpc silently ignores.
And second there are two
