On 21.11.2016 02:05, Le Duc Hieu wrote:
> Is there any entry on Mantis for me to keep track of this bug status?
I've fixed that bug now (it did already work in mode Delphi by the way),
so now you can use this:
=== code begin ===
type
generic TGList = record
public type
PGList = ^speciali
Am 21.11.2016 08:33 schrieb "Le Duc Hieu" :
>
> Is there any entry on Mantis for me to keep track of this bug status?
No, because I just noticed that there is one when testing for your question
;)
Regards,
Sven
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lis
Is there any entry on Mantis for me to keep track of this bug status?
Thanks.
On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 6:03 PM, Sven Barth
wrote:
> Am 20.11.2016 08:31 schrieb "Le Duc Hieu" :
> >
> > Here is the complete snippet that i wanted to create
> >
> >
> > Type
> > generic PGList = ^specialize TGList;
Am 20.11.2016 08:31 schrieb "Le Duc Hieu" :
>
> Here is the complete snippet that i wanted to create
>
>
> Type
> generic PGList = ^specialize TGList;
>
> generic TGList = record
> data: T;
> next: specialize PGList
> end;
You'll need to use nested types (they require modeswitch adva
Hi,
I'm trying to write a generic linked-list without the use of classes and
objects.
I need to be able to create generic pointer like this:
Type
generic PGList = ^specialize TGList;
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://
Here is the complete snippet that i wanted to create
Type
generic PGList = ^specialize TGList;
generic TGList = record
data: T;
next: specialize PGList
end;
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 11:11 PM, Le Duc Hieu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to write a generic linked-list without the use of
