Re: [fpc-pascal] LLVM (again)

2013-04-20 Thread Vittorio Giovara
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Mark Morgan Lloyd markmll.fpc-pas...@telemetry.co.uk wrote: Sven Barth wrote: Am 19.04.2013 14:05, schrieb Sven Barth: Am 19.04.2013 14:02, schrieb Reimar Grabowski: Hi, I have read the discussions about FPC using LLVM and the reasons against it (which

[fpc-pascal] LLVM (again)

2013-04-19 Thread Reimar Grabowski
Hi, I have read the discussions about FPC using LLVM and the reasons against it (which I fully understand and support). But a friend of mine called my attention to this: https://github.com/kripken/emscripten/wiki From what I have seen this is quite an amazing project. And being in the process

Re: [fpc-pascal] LLVM (again)

2013-04-19 Thread Nikolay Nikolov
On 04/19/2013 03:02 PM, Reimar Grabowski wrote: Hi, I have read the discussions about FPC using LLVM and the reasons against it (which I fully understand and support). But a friend of mine called my attention to this: https://github.com/kripken/emscripten/wiki From what I have seen this is

Re: [fpc-pascal] LLVM (again)

2013-04-19 Thread Sven Barth
Am 19.04.2013 14:05, schrieb Sven Barth: Am 19.04.2013 14:02, schrieb Reimar Grabowski: Hi, I have read the discussions about FPC using LLVM and the reasons against it (which I fully understand and support). But a friend of mine called my attention to this:

Re: [fpc-pascal] LLVM (again)

2013-04-19 Thread Reimar Grabowski
On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 14:06:44 +0200 Sven Barth pascaldra...@googlemail.com wrote: If you would have read the discussion about LLVM you would know that emscripten was the reason that it was brought up the last time... ;) Sorry, it should be Since you have read ... you should know ... It

Re: [fpc-pascal] LLVM (again)

2013-04-19 Thread Mark Morgan Lloyd
Sven Barth wrote: Am 19.04.2013 14:05, schrieb Sven Barth: Am 19.04.2013 14:02, schrieb Reimar Grabowski: Hi, I have read the discussions about FPC using LLVM and the reasons against it (which I fully understand and support). But a friend of mine called my attention to this: