On Friday 08 April 2016 17:08:08 Anthony Tekatch wrote:
>
> Can MSEgui/MSEide be used to make programs for Mac OSX ?
>
Currently not. In case of OSX-X11 compatibility layer the effort probably is
manageable. I would prefer a Quartz backend. Sponsors wanted! ;-)
Martin
My very short list:
Pro Lazarus:
- The LCL is very compatible with the Delphi VCL and so you can easily
port Delphi VCL applications to Linux (but for reasons I don't
understand Delphi moved to Firemonkey).
- On top of that there is a great number of rather compatible "widget
types" that all
On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 11:08:41 +0200, "Santiago A." wrote:
> Cons. The most important. It looks like Lazarus has more developers, so
> may be a better decision for the long term.
> The second is the RAD. The immediate two directions updates, from GUI to
> source and from source to GUI, is very hand
> Just a little hint: MSEide has "build modes". IIRC it had it even before
> Lazarus introduced them. Please ask on the MSEide+MSEgui mailinglist if you
> like to know how it works.
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.ide.mseide.user
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mseide-msegui-talk
On Friday 08 April 2016 13:33:35 Krzysztof wrote:
>
> I'm using MSEide only for design forms. For coding I'm still use
> Lazarus (with paths to MSEgui source) so I still can enjoy with
> Lazarus code completition, build modes etc.
Just a little hint: MSEide has "build modes". IIRC it had it even b
> > Maybe (once again IMO) the only con is that MSEide cannot deal with
> > LCL projects.
>
> Maybe not designing forms visually, but there is no problems in
> compiling LCL based projects with MSEide. In fact, I have done that many
> times before.
Oooops, I did not know that it was possible.
So,
On 2016-04-08 12:34, Fred van Stappen wrote:
> Maybe (once again IMO) the only con is that MSEide cannot deal with
> LCL projects.
Maybe not designing forms visually, but there is no problems in
compiling LCL based projects with MSEide. In fact, I have done that many
times before.
Regards,
- Gr
> con of mside why I don't use it:
>
> The behaviour of the cursor on the end of the line. You cannot go behind the
> line as it is usual in almost every other editor.
Huh, what do you mean ?
I do not feel any difference with other editors...
The big plus, IMO, of MSEide is his weight.
: less
2016-04-08 12:27 GMT+02:00 Rainer Stratmann :
> con of mside why I don't use it:
>
> The behaviour of the cursor on the end of the line. You cannot go behind the
> line as it is usual in almost every other editor. Martin says it is difficult
> to
> integrate which I find hard to understand. That b
con of mside why I don't use it:
The behaviour of the cursor on the end of the line. You cannot go behind the
line as it is usual in almost every other editor. Martin says it is difficult
to
integrate which I find hard to understand. That behaviour of the cursor
confuses me. The other editors
On 2016-04-08 10:08, Santiago A. wrote:
> Any body has experience in both (or another IDE for FPC) and has his two
> cents?
ps:
It's MSEide - if you are refering to the IDE portion of the project. ;-)
I switch between Lazarus and MSEide very frequently. Overall I prefer
MSEide. Yes it's settings
I'm also learning MSEgui from a few weeks. It was very hard start but
now I love it. First what you need understand is that it is not using
any Qt, Gtk, WinAPI backend as Lazarus so you never get native OS look
but of course you can imitate it with own style. Yes, MSEgui has
styles engine. For exam
I know it is a dangerous question that can easily turn into a holly
war, flame or whatever. But here it is.
I have only used Lazarus or a general editor (usually Jedit, geany).
Time ago I checked a little MSEgui and, well, I didn't go for it.
In MSEgui I found fonts small and interface not very n
13 matches
Mail list logo
