Hi,
Currently the FAQ shows Position Independent Code generation is currently
broken in the creation of shared libraries, (Future Plans shows 2.4 working
to recover it). I tried to search the web site but the search system gives
an error right now.
Please, what version did PIC last work in
On 18 Nov 2007, at 11:10, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Please, what version did PIC last work in for Linux
PIC works in 2.2.0.
Afaik it doesn't.
Jonas
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
Jonas Maebe schrieb:
On 18 Nov 2007, at 11:10, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Please, what version did PIC last work in for Linux
PIC works in 2.2.0.
Afaik it doesn't.
Are there any bug reports? x86-64 is afaik even build with pic.
___
fpc-pascal
On 18 Nov 2007, at 11:29, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Jonas Maebe schrieb:
On 18 Nov 2007, at 11:10, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Please, what version did PIC last work in for Linux
PIC works in 2.2.0.
Afaik it doesn't.
Are there any bug reports? x86-64 is afaik even build with pic.
x86_64
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Hi,
Currently the FAQ shows Position Independent Code generation is
currently broken in the creation of shared libraries, (Future Plans
shows 2.4 working to recover it). I tried to search the web site but
the search system gives an error right now.
Please, what
On Nov 18, 2007 11:10 AM, Florian Klaempfl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and Windows?
Windows needs no PIC.
Isn't PIC the same as relocatable code? Which would be activated by
-WR as described on the item 3 here:
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/FPC_and_Apache_Modules#Possible_problems
I
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho schrieb:
On Nov 18, 2007 11:10 AM, Florian Klaempfl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and Windows?
Windows needs no PIC.
Isn't PIC the same as relocatable code?
No. PIC allows only to map the same physical mem page with program code
at different virtual memory locations.
