Hi list,
On ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/dist/2.6.0/bootstrap/ there are a
lot of bootstrap compilers, but I miss a x86 Windows bootstrap compiler.
Would it be possible to upload one, or can I use the 2.4.2 compiler to
compile FPC 2.6.x/2.7.x sources on Windows?
Thanks,
Reinier
_
In our previous episode, Reinier Olislagers said:
> On ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/dist/2.6.0/bootstrap/ there are a
> lot of bootstrap compilers, but I miss a x86 Windows bootstrap compiler.
It is the responsibility of the platform maintainers to upload that.
That being said, for windows it
On 27-1-2012 13:01, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> In our previous episode, Reinier Olislagers said:
>> On ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/dist/2.6.0/bootstrap/ there are a
>> lot of bootstrap compilers, but I miss a x86 Windows bootstrap compiler.
>
> It is the responsibility of the platform mainta
In our previous episode, Reinier Olislagers said:
> > It is the responsibility of the platform maintainers to upload that.
> >
> > That being said, for windows it makes less sense than for other platforms,
> > since the release also contains (possibly updated) binutils.
> Ok. I'm wondering whether
On 27-1-2012 13:22, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> In our previous episode, Reinier Olislagers said:
>>> It is the responsibility of the platform maintainers to upload that.
>>>
>>> That being said, for windows it makes less sense than for other platforms,
>>> since the release also contains (possibly
In our previous episode, Reinier Olislagers said:
> >> binutils as the ones available at
> >> http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/fpcbuild/trunk/install/binw32/...
> >
> > _Probably_ the same. But the ones from 2.6.0 are the _guaranteed_ working
> > ones.
>
>
> That's what I suspected. So when buildin
On 27-1-2012 13:33, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> In our previous episode, Reinier Olislagers said:
>> That's what I suspected. So when building a Win32 system from scratch,
>> I'd have to either extract the files from the installer or perhaps get
>> them from a stable branch like:
>> http://svn.free
In our previous episode, Reinier Olislagers said:
> >
> > No, tags/release_2_6_0 would then be the one. What is currently already in
> > fixed could theoretically already have been changed for 2.6.2
> >
> Thanks, Marco; I thought 2.6.1 fixes would be stability improvements to
> 2.6.
True. But bo
Op 27 januari 2012 14:00 heeft Marco van de Voort
het volgende geschreven:
> One can try to cut corners, but that will only end up having to install the
> release anyway at the first hickup.
I'd expect the utils in fpcbuild/trunk to be able to build fpc/trunk
better than the release ones, otherwi
On 27-1-2012 14:00, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> In our previous episode, Reinier Olislagers said:
>>>
>>> No, tags/release_2_6_0 would then be the one. What is currently already in
>>> fixed could theoretically already have been changed for 2.6.2
>>>
>> Thanks, Marco; I thought 2.6.1 fixes would be
In our previous episode, Vincent Snijders said:
> > One can try to cut corners, but that will only end up having to install the
> > release anyway at the first hickup.
>
> I'd expect the utils in fpcbuild/trunk to be able to build fpc/trunk
> better than the release ones, otherwise they should not
On Fri, January 27, 2012 14:10, Vincent Snijders wrote:
> Op 27 januari 2012 14:00 heeft Marco van de Voort
> het volgende geschreven:
>> One can try to cut corners, but that will only end up having to install
>> the
>> release anyway at the first hickup.
>
> I'd expect the utils in fpcbuild/trunk
12 matches
Mail list logo
