Hi,
I'm using fpc 2.6.4.
While i was playing a bit with issue
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=20522 I stmbled upon unexpected
behaviour of StrToDate function.
StrToDate('6-12-2011 ') (note the space at the end) actually gives me 6-12-2014.
===
program stodate;
On 10/05/2014 13:55, Bart wrote:
Hi,
I'm using fpc 2.6.4.
While i was playing a bit with issue
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=20522 I stmbled upon unexpected
behaviour of StrToDate function.
StrToDate('6-12-2011 ') (note the space at the end) actually gives me 6-12-2014.
...
Could
On Sat, 10 May 2014, Bart wrote:
Hi,
I'm using fpc 2.6.4.
While i was playing a bit with issue
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=20522 I stmbled upon unexpected
behaviour of StrToDate function.
StrToDate('6-12-2011 ') (note the space at the end) actually gives me 6-12-2014.
That is
On 5/10/14, Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
StrToDate('6-12-2011 ') (note the space at the end) actually gives me
6-12-2014.
That is because the last part is not 'correct' (contains trailing garbage)
and
then the strtodate assumes the year is missing, and substitutes the
On Sat, 10 May 2014, Bart wrote:
On 5/10/14, Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
StrToDate('6-12-2011 ') (note the space at the end) actually gives me
6-12-2014.
That is because the last part is not 'correct' (contains trailing garbage)
and
then the strtodate assumes the
On 5/10/14, Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
Fixed.
You fixed it faste then it took me to type the bugreport!
I cannot test with trunk, so feel free to close the issue in the bugtracker.
B.t.w. I could not find an entry in Product version for 2.6.4 (or
2.7.1 for that matter).
On Sat, 10 May 2014, Bart wrote:
On 5/10/14, Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
Fixed.
You fixed it faste then it took me to type the bugreport!
I cannot test with trunk, so feel free to close the issue in the bugtracker.
Will do, thanks.
B.t.w. I could not find an
On 10.05.2014 16:20, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
B.t.w. I could not find an entry in Product version for 2.6.4 (or
2.7.1 for that matter).
Where should I report this?
You should not. There is a version 2.6.4, I added a version 'trunk'.
To avoid having to re-create each trunk version.
I
On Sat, 10 May 2014, Sven Barth wrote:
On 10.05.2014 16:20, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
B.t.w. I could not find an entry in Product version for 2.6.4 (or
2.7.1 for that matter).
Where should I report this?
You should not. There is a version 2.6.4, I added a version 'trunk'.
To avoid having
On 10/05/14 16:20, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
You should not. There is a version 2.6.4, I added a version 'trunk'.
To avoid having to re-create each trunk version.
I don't think that is good. It will make it much harder to determine
which trunk version the bug report is about. It makes it
On 10/05/14 17:37, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Sat, 10 May 2014, Sven Barth wrote:
On 10.05.2014 16:20, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
I believe it was intentional that we didn't have a trunk version. At
least that's what I rememeber...
Yes, in hindsight a bad idea. I removed it meanwhile.
11 matches
Mail list logo
