Also, what's the difference between TBufDataset and TMemDataset?
Aren't they both in-memory datasets? If so, why do we have two
different components for the same thing?
As Michael wrote TMemDataSet is older.
And I add that it is also much "lighter". So for somebody who does not
need "compl
On 2017-10-09 15:33, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
So it is recommended to use TBufDataset over TMemDataset?
Yes, absolutely.
Thanks.
Ah, I see Git is growing on you [using git terminology there].;-)
It definitely has a way of crawling under your skin...;)
Resistance is futile. :-)
Rega
On Mon, 9 Oct 2017, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 2017-10-09 09:08, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Because it was never meant to be a TClientDataset equivalent, but it has
grown into something that does many of the things TClientDataset does.
Naming it TClientDataset would imply that we ensure TCl
On 2017-10-09 09:08, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Because it was never meant to be a TClientDataset equivalent, but it has
grown into something that does many of the things TClientDataset does.
Naming it TClientDataset would imply that we ensure TClientDataset
compatibility, which definitely was/i
On Sun, 8 Oct 2017, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hi,
I read a couple of archived mailing list posts about TBufDataset, which
from what I read is FPC's equivalent to TClientDataset.
Equivalent in that it does many things that TClientDataset does.
That then begs the question... Why isn't it c
On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 3:58 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I read a couple of archived mailing list posts about TBufDataset, which from
> what I read is FPC's equivalent to TClientDataset.
>
> That then begs the question... Why isn't it called TClientDataset in FPC?
> What happened to Delp
Hi,
I read a couple of archived mailing list posts about TBufDataset, which
from what I read is FPC's equivalent to TClientDataset.
That then begs the question... Why isn't it called TClientDataset in
FPC? What happened to Delphi-compatibility?
Also, what's the difference between TBufDatase
