On Wednesday 23 July 2008 7:46 pm, Marc Santhoff wrote:
> That's interesting and nice. Can I assume the same is valid for dyn
> arrays in a procedure or function context?
The short answer is yes.
There was recently (about a month ago) a discussion about some of these
very issues, from 21 to 29 J
Am Mittwoch, den 23.07.2008, 19:21 +0200 schrieb Luca Olivetti:
> El Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:15:13 +0200
> Marc Santhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>
> > That's the important part, I'm dealing with cleanly freeing strings
> > when destroying objects.
>
> I may be wrong but I think you don't need t
Am Mittwoch, den 23.07.2008, 17:10 -0300 schrieb Joao Morais:
> Luca Olivetti wrote:
> > El Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:15:13 +0200
> > Marc Santhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> >
> >> That's the important part, I'm dealing with cleanly freeing strings
> >> when destroying objects.
> >
> > I may be w
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:54:08 +0200
Luca Olivetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> En/na Mattias Gaertner ha escrit:
>
> >> [*]though I know of at least a nasty leak with gtk2 under lazarus
> >> that heaptrc didn't trace.
> >
> > Which one?
>
> http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=9259
> (I just n
En/na Mattias Gaertner ha escrit:
[*]though I know of at least a nasty leak with gtk2 under lazarus that
heaptrc didn't trace.
Which one?
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=9259
(I just noticed you fixed it, but heaptrc didn't report anything when I
first discovered it).
Bye
--
Luca
Luca Olivetti wrote:
El Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:15:13 +0200
Marc Santhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
That's the important part, I'm dealing with cleanly freeing strings
when destroying objects.
I may be wrong but I think you don't need to do anything, when you free
a class the memory used by s
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:21:00 +0200
Luca Olivetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> El Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:15:13 +0200
> Marc Santhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>
> > That's the important part, I'm dealing with cleanly freeing strings
> > when destroying objects.
>
> I may be wrong but I think you
El Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:15:13 +0200
Marc Santhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> That's the important part, I'm dealing with cleanly freeing strings
> when destroying objects.
I may be wrong but I think you don't need to do anything, when you free
a class the memory used by string fields is autom
Am Mittwoch, den 23.07.2008, 08:28 +0100 schrieb Jonas Maebe:
> On 23 Jul 2008, at 06:32, Marc Santhoff wrote:
>
> > I understand right that (as I have asked before) an empty (ansi)string
> > is equal to NIL.
>
> True.
>
> > If this is correct, is setting a string to '' the same as setting the
>
On 23 Jul 2008, at 06:32, Marc Santhoff wrote:
I understand right that (as I have asked before) an empty (ansi)string
is equal to NIL.
True.
If this is correct, is setting a string to '' the same as setting the
string to NIL?
No.
So i can e.g. use exchagably:
{$H+}
var
s: string;
begi
Hi,
I understand right that (as I have asked before) an empty (ansi)string
is equal to NIL.
If this is correct, is setting a string to '' the same as setting the
string to NIL?
So i can e.g. use exchagably:
{$H+}
var
s: string;
begin
s := 'something';
{ this ... }
s := '';
{ ... wo
11 matches
Mail list logo
