I am trying to convert nano-X.h to a pas file but I get some errors.
This is 2 of them.
I cannot se what the problem is, can anyone give me a hint.
Carsten
at line 698 error : syntax error
at line 964 error : syntax error
Unexpected wrap of line 964
" { GR_WM_PROPERTIES props
I am trying to write a small program using the nano-x library.
-
Unit NanoX;
interface
{$mode objfpc}
Const
LibNanoX='nano-X';
function GrOpen:longint;cdecl;external LibNanoX;
implementation
end.
--
program Nanoxdemo;
uses
NanoX,linux,sysutils;
begin
if
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006, Carsten Bager wrote:
I am trying to write a small program using the nano-x library.
-
Unit NanoX;
interface
{$mode objfpc}
Const
LibNanoX='nano-X';
function GrOpen:longint;cdecl;external LibNanoX;
implementation
end.
--
program Nanoxde
>
> You need to link to the C library as well.
>
> So, add
>
> {$linklib c}
_Never_ add linklib c or linklib gcc directly, always work via unit initc.
That's what it is for.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.fre
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006, Marco van de Voort wrote:
You need to link to the C library as well.
So, add
{$linklib c}
_Never_ add linklib c or linklib gcc directly, always work via unit initc.
That's what it is for.
I thought the compiler did this automatically when it detects a link to
the C
> On Thu, 20 Jul 2006, Marco van de Voort wrote:
>
> >>
> >> You need to link to the C library as well.
> >>
> >> So, add
> >>
> >> {$linklib c}
> >
> > _Never_ add linklib c or linklib gcc directly, always work via unit initc.
> > That's what it is for.
>
> I thought the compiler did this automa
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006, Marco van de Voort wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006, Marco van de Voort wrote:
You need to link to the C library as well.
So, add
{$linklib c}
_Never_ add linklib c or linklib gcc directly, always work via unit initc.
That's what it is for.
I thought the compiler did th
> On Thu, 20 Jul 2006, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> > (libdl,libgettext,libgcc), and to encapsulate libc errno access.
> >
> > There shouldn't be a {$linklib C or linklib gcc in any unit. _always_ via
> > unit initc.
>
> If you really believe that:
> I suggest you start working on the sources in SV
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006, Marco van de Voort wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006, Marco van de Voort wrote:
(libdl,libgettext,libgcc), and to encapsulate libc errno access.
There shouldn't be a {$linklib C or linklib gcc in any unit. _always_ via
unit initc.
If you really believe that:
I suggest you sta
> On Thu, 20 Jul 2006, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> >> If you really believe that:
> >> I suggest you start working on the sources in SVN then, because there are
> >> _a lot_ of them.
> >>
> >> But I don't think that it should be done like that...
> >
> > Because?
>
> Because firstly I think that w
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006, Marco van de Voort wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006, Marco van de Voort wrote:
If you really believe that:
I suggest you start working on the sources in SVN then, because there are
_a lot_ of them.
But I don't think that it should be done like that...
Because?
Because firs
(snip water under the bridge)
> As for your arguments:
>
> You are 100% right that it may be a good thing to have a central place which
> somehow regulates access to libc; It will make things clearer and more
> maintainable. However, if you want to position it like that, I do think
> that it
> You need to link to the C library as well.
When I use initc I get thise errors
Linking nanoxdemo
L:\Lib\fpc202\arm-linux\cprt0.o: In function `_start':
: undefined reference to `__libc_start_main'
L:\Lib\fpc202\arm-linux\cprt0.o: In function `_haltproc'
: undefined reference to `_fini'
L:\Lib\
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006, Marco van de Voort wrote:
(snip water under the bridge)
As for your arguments:
You are 100% right that it may be a good thing to have a central place which
somehow regulates access to libc; It will make things clearer and more
maintainable. However, if you want to posi
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006, Carsten Bager wrote:
> You need to link to the C library as well.
When I use initc I get thise errors
Linking nanoxdemo
L:\Lib\fpc202\arm-linux\cprt0.o: In function `_start':
: undefined reference to `__libc_start_main'
L:\Lib\fpc202\arm-linux\cprt0.o: In function `_halt
> When I use initc I get thise errors
>
> Linking nanoxdemo
> L:\Lib\fpc202\arm-linux\cprt0.o: In function `_start':
> : undefined reference to `__libc_start_main'
> L:\Lib\fpc202\arm-linux\cprt0.o: In function `_haltproc'
> : undefined reference to `_fini'
> L:\Lib\fpc202\arm-linux\cprt0.o: In fu
>
> On Thu, 20 Jul 2006, Carsten Bager wrote:
>
> > > You need to link to the C library as well.
> >
> > When I use initc I get thise errors
> >
> > Linking nanoxdemo
> > L:\Lib\fpc202\arm-linux\cprt0.o: In function `_start':
> > : undefined reference to `__libc_start_main'
> > L:\Lib\fpc202\arm-
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006, Carsten Bager wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006, Carsten Bager wrote:
You need to link to the C library as well.
When I use initc I get thise errors
Linking nanoxdemo
L:\Lib\fpc202\arm-linux\cprt0.o: In function `_start':
: undefined reference to `__libc_start_main'
L:\Lib\
> Patch cprt0.as for your libc.
The libc that my platform is using is micro libc, and unfortunately the micro
libc is
initialized the same way as libc.
Does anyone have a hint?
Carsten
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
h
> > Patch cprt0.as for your libc.
>
> The libc that my platform is using is micro libc, and unfortunately the micro
> libc is
> initialized the same way as libc.
> Does anyone have a hint?
objdump a helloworld C program, and investigate.
___
fpc-pas
20 matches
Mail list logo
