El 13/08/16 a les 00:28, Jonas Maebe ha escrit:
On 12/08/16 22:51, Luca Olivetti wrote:
El 12/08/16 a les 20:40, Jonas Maebe ha escrit:
On 12/08/16 20:32, Sven Barth wrote:
Better don't rely on it then. If at all it would be implemented
properly
(and for Delphi compatibility it probably will).
On 12/08/16 22:51, Luca Olivetti wrote:
El 12/08/16 a les 20:40, Jonas Maebe ha escrit:
On 12/08/16 20:32, Sven Barth wrote:
Better don't rely on it then. If at all it would be implemented properly
(and for Delphi compatibility it probably will).
According to the bug report mentioned in the f
El 12/08/16 a les 20:40, Jonas Maebe ha escrit:
On 12/08/16 20:32, Sven Barth wrote:
Better don't rely on it then. If at all it would be implemented properly
(and for Delphi compatibility it probably will).
According to the bug report mentioned in the first message of this
thread, Delphi only
Am 12.08.2016 20:40 schrieb "Jonas Maebe" :
>
> On 12/08/16 20:32, Sven Barth wrote:
>>
>> Better don't rely on it then. If at all it would be implemented properly
>> (and for Delphi compatibility it probably will).
>
>
> According to the bug report mentioned in the first message of this
thread, De
On 12/08/16 20:32, Sven Barth wrote:
Better don't rely on it then. If at all it would be implemented properly
(and for Delphi compatibility it probably will).
According to the bug report mentioned in the first message of this
thread, Delphi only supports overloading for default properties.
Am 12.08.2016 17:27 schrieb "Luca Olivetti" :
>
> El 12/08/16 a les 17:13, Sven Barth ha escrit:
>
>
>>>
>>> Is this by design or is it just an accident?
>>
>>
>> Accident.
>
>
> Ouch!
> In that case please, don't fix it ;-)
Better don't rely on it then. If at all it would be implemented properly
On Fri, 12 Aug 2016, Luca Olivetti wrote:
El 12/08/16 a les 17:13, Sven Barth ha escrit:
Is this by design or is it just an accident?
Accident.
Ouch!
In that case please, don't fix it ;-)
Or better, properly implement array property overloading...
Michael.
___
El 12/08/16 a les 17:13, Sven Barth ha escrit:
Is this by design or is it just an accident?
Accident.
Ouch!
In that case please, don't fix it ;-)
Bye
--
Luca
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/
Am 12.08.2016 16:52 schrieb "Luca Olivetti" :
>
> I'm still using fpc 2.6.4 (but I tested what I'm saying below with fpc
3.0.0 too).
>
> I need to overload the type of the index of an indexed property, e.g.
>
> function GetMyProp(index:integer):TMyPropType;
> function GetMyProp(index:TMyType):TMyPr
I'm still using fpc 2.6.4 (but I tested what I'm saying below with fpc
3.0.0 too).
I need to overload the type of the index of an indexed property, e.g.
function GetMyProp(index:integer):TMyPropType;
function GetMyProp(index:TMyType):TMyPropType;
property MyProp[index:integer]:TMyPropType
10 matches
Mail list logo