On 2016-09-22 05:33, Lars wrote:
> p.s. unrelated off topic: someone said that Delphi Berlin Starter only
> works on Windows 10. I found it worked fine on my Windows 7, FYI.
Someone simply didn't bother reading the download web page correctly,
and then spread false information.
Regards,
Graeme
On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 22:43:57 -0600
"Lars" wrote:
> On Wed, September 21, 2016 6:27 am, Pierre Free Pascal wrote:
> > There is also the -gc option:
> > -gcGenerate checks for pointers
> >
> >
> > This is another debugging option, that is not used very often,
>
>
> I
On Wed, September 21, 2016 6:27 am, Pierre Free Pascal wrote:
> There is also the -gc option:
> -gcGenerate checks for pointers
>
>
> This is another debugging option, that is not used very often,
I could not find this option in the Lazarus options under debugging or any
other tab...
> On 2016-09-21 13:27, Pierre Free Pascal wrote:
>
> There is also the -gc option:
> -gcGenerate checks for pointers
>
I was going to add to my original post "sorry if this feature already
exists, or something similar".
Now I have to see what Delphi offers, as I use fpc and delphi and
Pierre Free Pascal wrote:
> As the fix is not cpu specific, I enabled the -gc option
> for all linux systems in trunk, but this is untested.
Please never do that. I am the one that disabled this specific option in
the past (and others too) because they had never been tested and were
often
On 2016-09-21 14:23, Pierre Free Pascal wrote:
> I assume that your system is a
> x86_64-linux...
Yup.
> So if you are using linux OS, -gc option is probably only usable
> starting with today's trunk commits.
Thank you very much.
Regards,
Graeme
I assume that your system is a
x86_64-linux...
for linux, it seems only 32bit systems are supported,
mainly because there is no stack validation code for 64-bit target...
The list of supported targets is in: systems_support_checkpointer
For version 3.0.0:
systems.pas:342:
On 2016-09-21 13:27, Pierre Free Pascal wrote:
>There is also the -gc option:
> -gcGenerate checks for pointers
Interesting, I didn't know about that option.
Unfortunately under CentOS 6 Linux I get:
Fatal: Option "-gc" is not, or not yet, supported on the current target
> -Message d'origine-
> De : fpc-pascal-boun...@lists.freepascal.org [mailto:fpc-pascal-
> boun...@lists.freepascal.org] De la part de Martin
> Envoyé : mercredi 21 septembre 2016 12:38
> À : FPC-Pascal users discussions
> Objet : Re: [fpc-pascal] with no if assigned() there are bugs
>
On 21/09/16 11:00, Martin wrote:
On 21/09/2016 09:05, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Presumably this would be an assertion that something is assigned. A
related test is that an object is a specific subtype before using it
as such
Assert(PageControl1.ActivePage.Controls[0] is TSynEdit);
syn :=
On 21/09/2016 09:05, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Presumably this would be an assertion that something is assigned. A
related test is that an object is a specific subtype before using it
as such
Assert(PageControl1.ActivePage.Controls[0] is TSynEdit);
syn :=
On 21/09/16 06:30, Tomas Hajny wrote:
On Wed, September 21, 2016 07:29, Lars wrote:
Hi,
Hi all, I am wondering what your thoughts are on this
idea: add the ability to do if assigned() on all
objects to prevent bugs, maybe as a compiler feature.
.
.
What would be the supposed "else"
On Wed, September 21, 2016 07:29, Lars wrote:
Hi,
> Hi all, I am wondering what your thoughts are on this
> idea: add the ability to do if assigned() on all
> objects to prevent bugs, maybe as a compiler feature.
.
.
What would be the supposed "else" clause of your "if" statement? I assume
On Tue, 20 Sep 2016, Lars wrote:
Hi all, I am wondering what your thoughts are on this idea: add the
ability to do if assigned() on all objects to prevent bugs, maybe as a
compiler feature. Before you write me off as just another person
requesting yet another silly feature (it may in fact be
Hi all, I am wondering what your thoughts are on this idea: add the
ability to do if assigned() on all objects to prevent bugs, maybe as a
compiler feature. Before you write me off as just another person
requesting yet another silly feature (it may in fact be that), here is the
problem:
A lot of
15 matches
Mail list logo