Ludo Brands wrote:
Reported as issue 0020806. I'm not able to test using a
recent Delphi,
or on a 64-bit CPU.
I think you could report directly to sorokin too. If he fixes
it, then we can merge the fix here.
regexpr is a nearly unchanged copy from sorokin, except for
the alignment patch whi
> > Reported as issue 0020806. I'm not able to test using a
> recent Delphi,
> > or on a 64-bit CPU.
>
> I think you could report directly to sorokin too. If he fixes
> it, then we can merge the fix here.
>
> regexpr is a nearly unchanged copy from sorokin, except for
> the alignment patch wh
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 8:30 AM, Mark Morgan Lloyd
wrote:
> Reported as issue 0020806. I'm not able to test using a recent Delphi, or on
> a 64-bit CPU.
I think you could report directly to sorokin too. If he fixes it, then
we can merge the fix here.
regexpr is a nearly unchanged copy from soroki
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
I have no idea about your question, but it might be interresting for
you to know, just in case you already don't, the wiki page about the
new Regexpr in FPC: http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Regexpr
It almost works: Exec() is OK (at least with trunk, I migh
On 3 December 2011 16:29, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho <
felipemonteiro.carva...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have no idea about your question, but it might be interresting for
> you to know, just in case you already don't, the wiki page about the
> new Regexpr in FPC: http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/R
I have no idea about your question, but it might be interresting for
you to know, just in case you already don't, the wiki page about the
new Regexpr in FPC: http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Regexpr
> It almost works: Exec() is OK (at least with trunk, I might have seen a
> problem with a vers
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Mark Morgan Lloyd
wrote:
Has anybody with experience of WideStrings tried compiling the "new" Regexpr
unit to support them?
Which "new" Regexpr? The one in packages/regexpr or another one?
I always thought that the one I adde
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Mark Morgan Lloyd
wrote:
> Has anybody with experience of WideStrings tried compiling the "new" Regexpr
> unit to support them?
Which "new" Regexpr? The one in packages/regexpr or another one?
I always thought that the one I added was focused on utf-8, although I
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Has anybody with experience of WideStrings tried compiling the "new"
Regexpr unit to support them?
I'm in a position where I could very much benefit from using these, but
I think that I'm only seeing patterns match for characters <= #$00ff and
even then am not seeing
