Hi! Sorry for my english, at first.
I get sniff logs from google's cache, but they seem's not full. I get my
own log's ( about 10-20 mb ) - not all very easy there. 4 first bytes -
are packet number, but all other... I can't see any logic there. I can
give you my logs (but in next monday - i am
On Friday 31 Jul 2009 2:19:18 pm Damir Syabitov wrote:
Hi! Sorry for my english, at first.
I get sniff logs from google's cache, but they seem's not full. I get my
own log's ( about 10-20 mb ) - not all very easy there. 4 first bytes -
are packet number, but all other... I can't see any logic
If i got the meaning of that parameter, you are lowering the
number of minutiae needed to have a match to 10;
indeed fingerprint verification succeeds most of the times now!
How did you choose 10 as a value?
Is it secure, in a way it doesnt produce false positives?
For instance here in italy the
On Friday 31 July 2009 11:22:33 Kunal Gangakhedkar wrote:
On Friday 31 Jul 2009 2:19:18 pm Damir Syabitov wrote:
Hi! Sorry for my english, at first.
I get sniff logs from google's cache, but they seem's not full. I get my
own log's ( about 10-20 mb ) - not all very easy there. 4 first bytes
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 07/31/2009 05:36 AM, Guido Grazioli wrote:
How did you choose 10 as a value?
Is it secure, in a way it doesnt produce false positives?
For instance here in italy the local government has set
that value to 16-17 minutiae (with 17 being a 100%
positive match)
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 14:40 +0200, Nagatoro wrote:
On Friday 31 July 2009 11:22:33 Kunal Gangakhedkar wrote:
On Friday 31 Jul 2009 2:19:18 pm Damir Syabitov wrote:
Hi! Sorry for my english, at first.
I get sniff logs from google's cache, but they seem's not full. I
get my
own log's (
