The writer should read it over, but IMHO someone else should also read
it. It's hard for the same person to catch all the mistakes and ambiguities.
Regards,
Shmuel Wolfson
Steve Rickaby wrote:
> An interesting discussion, and you all make very valid points. Here in the UK
> some of the folks I
I know how to place a line above or below text using reference page
graphics and the advanced properties for the paragraph, but is there a
way to place graphics on either side of a single piece of text? I am
making a Glossary and for the GlossaryEntry paragraph tag (A, B, C,
etc.), I have been aske
Tammy,
FrameMaker does not provide a feature specifically for putting a graphic
to the side of a paragraph. Using tables is probably the most frequent way
to achieve that effect. Another technique is to create two paragraphs with
negative spacing between them so that they overlap vertically.
Tammy,
FrameMaker does not provide a feature specifically for putting a graphic
to the side of a paragraph. Using tables is probably the most frequent way
to achieve that effect. Another technique is to create two paragraphs with
negative spacing between them so that they overlap vertically.
I know how to place a line above or below text using reference page
graphics and the advanced properties for the paragraph, but is there a
way to place graphics on either side of a single piece of text? I am
making a Glossary and for the GlossaryEntry paragraph tag (A, B, C,
etc.), I have been aske
Hi all-
I'm having some Windows-related issues I'm hoping someone can shed some
light on...
I currently have Adobe Reader 8 and FrameMaker 7.2 installed with
Windows XP Pro 2002/SP-2.
I DO NOT have any version of Adobe Acrobat installed -- I uninstalled it
and we are supposed to be using it via a
Hi all-
I'm having some Windows-related issues I'm hoping someone can shed some
light on...
I currently have Adobe Reader 8 and FrameMaker 7.2 installed with
Windows XP Pro 2002/SP-2.
I DO NOT have any version of Adobe Acrobat installed -- I uninstalled it
and we are supposed to be using it via
I think that their are two kinds of Technical Proofing/Editing.
1. Technical/Functional Editing - This is performed by the SME. It is
to check that all of your technical facts are correct. This could be QA
engineers, Software Programmers, or like at my company, PH.D scientists.
(Most of the peopl
I think that their are two kinds of Technical Proofing/Editing.
1. Technical/Functional Editing - This is performed by the SME. It is
to check that all of your technical facts are correct. This could be QA
engineers, Software Programmers, or like at my company, PH.D scientists.
(Most of the peopl
In publishing terms (old style, pre-PC), the final proofing had to be done
by the author, but this used to be done jointly in three stages, first the
galleys, second, the page proofs and finally the index. The typesetter also
proofed all the copy and of course, the copy editors did their bit. If th
Hi,
Using FrameMaker 6, webworks 7.0 professional.
I'm using the same source files to produce winhelp and compiled HTML. In
winhelp, the gifs are great--very clear. However, when seen in the .chm
version some are suddenly blurry and "scratchy" looking. Playing with the
"import by reference" and
The writer should read it over, but IMHO someone else should also read
it. It's hard for the same person to catch all the mistakes and ambiguities.
Regards,
Shmuel Wolfson
Steve Rickaby wrote:
An interesting discussion, and you all make very valid points. Here in the UK some of the folks I wor
12 matches
Mail list logo