Dov,
One of the first things I do after installation of Acrobat is to fix the
system
permissions and modify the "Standard" joboptions to much more rational
settings.
A few years back you had posted on the Adobe FrameMaker Forum an excellent
slide presentation of a talk you gave about creatin
The simplistic solution is to purchase the same fonts for windows and migrate
to FM 9. You can keep your Macs and use Parallels or VMWare Fusion.
On Jul 23, 2010, at 9:31, "boenat at gedok.com" wrote:
> Hi, there,
>
> we here were working as long as possible with our old Framemaker 7 on the
>
Just to thanks all who replied to my post. I must've been having one of
those Fridays, as part of the mystery is now solved.
I am working on a windows machine running XPPro 2002 SP3. When installing
Acrobat 9 (v.9.3.3-CPSID_83708), I removed all prior instances of Acrobat
and Acrobat Reader as req
VMWare Fusion, it's a workstation. There are no equivalents in VMWare on the
Mac for servers or players.
On Jul 24, 2010, at 8:53, Steve Johnson wrote:
> VMWare ... what? Player? Workstation? Server, etc?
>
>>
But, Dov---
I have both installed so that when a reviewer runs into a problem, I can
"see it their way". The interfaces of the two are so different that
it's sometimes handy to be able to do this.
Would it be any less "NOT RECOMMENDED" if one had the Reader on a
removable drive (such as a U
You CAN have Reader and Acrobat at the same time. You CANNOT have two
Acrobats; IOW, two PDF creators.
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Fei Min Lorente
wrote:
> Thanks, Dov! I was experiencing the same problem as Alison, insofar as
> my browser would crash when I tried to look at a PDF in it (jus
The simplistic solution is to purchase the same fonts for windows and migrate
to FM 9. You can keep your Macs and use Parallels or VMWare Fusion.
On Jul 23, 2010, at 9:31, "boe...@gedok.com" wrote:
> Hi, there,
>
> we here were working as long as possible with our old Framemaker 7 on the
> ma
VMWare Fusion, it's a workstation. There are no equivalents in VMWare on the
Mac for servers or players.
On Jul 24, 2010, at 8:53, Steve Johnson wrote:
> VMWare ... what? Player? Workstation? Server, etc?
>
>>
___
You are currently subscribed to f
Show me in writing where Adobe says you should not install the same
version of Reader and Acrobat on the same system. I cannot find it.
It's not on the download page of either product, which is where it
should be. All I can find is info saying you should not install two
different versions of the sa
In terms of the ability to "see PDFs like they do," having Adobe Reader
on the same system as Adobe Acrobat is not going to assist you. In terms
of proper engineering and QA discipline, such testing should occur on a
system that has only the operating system installed, no "extra fonts"
installed
> In terms of the ability to "see PDFs like they do," having Adobe Reader
> on the same system as Adobe Acrobat is not going to assist you. In terms
> of proper engineering and QA discipline, such testing should occur on a
> system that has only the operating system installed, no "extra fonts"
> i
Brag #2: my team use Frame 9 on Windoze XP on Intel Macs running
Parallels (another virtual machine program like VMWare Fusion). Works
flawlessly, although it does take a few minutes to boot up. But since it
can boot up Windows in the background while doing other things on the
Mac, it's not a
Brag #2: my team use Frame 9 on Windoze XP on Intel Macs running
Parallels (another virtual machine program like VMWare Fusion). Works
flawlessly, although it does take a few minutes to boot up. But since it
can boot up Windows in the background while doing other things on the
Mac, it's not a
Since when? Is that by design or by accident? Doesn't installing
Acrobat also install Reader?
How many of my users have Acrobat installed? Of course I want Reader
installed so I can see PDFs like they do.
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Dov Isaacs wrote:
> Although you CAN have both Reader and
Sorry Dov,... :}
Jeez you guys let up on the poor guy. Dov is not saying anything new.
In fact these things have been the case for years.
There are few people that have the experience that Dov has and take
most old-timers word for it on this list, and others, you are well
advised to take
Steve,
I never said that "Adobe says you should not install the same version
of Reader and Acrobat on the same system." That does not exist as an
official recommendation from either Adobe Technical Support or from the
Acrobat development organization. Having said that, as THE person within
Adobe
Steve,
I never said that "Adobe says you should not install the same version
of Reader and Acrobat on the same system." That does not exist as an
official recommendation from either Adobe Technical Support or from the
Acrobat development organization. Having said that, as THE person within
Adobe
Dov,
Although this takes the thread off-topic a bit, is there any way to
configure Reader to be a "portable" ap that runs from a thumb drive?
I certainly don't disagree with your advice about not having Reader on
an Acrobat system, but for many of us that isn't possible -- for
example, if you wor
Guy,
See previous responses. Yes, there are UI differences between
Acrobat and Reader, but unless you are invoking rather complex
Javascript routines that invoke functions that are allowed in
Acrobat but not Reader, other than font issues (you should NEVER,
repeat NEVER, repeat once again NEVER ge
Guy,
See previous responses. Yes, there are UI differences between
Acrobat and Reader, but unless you are invoking rather complex
Javascript routines that invoke functions that are allowed in
Acrobat but not Reader, other than font issues (you should NEVER,
repeat NEVER, repeat once again NEVER ge
Art,
Please see my the reply I just sent to a another response along
the same line.
I know of know of no way to make such a "portable app" for better
or worse. I'm not saying there isn't, I'm just not aware of it.
- Dov
> -Original Message-
> From: Art Campbell [mailto:art.cam
Art,
Please see my the reply I just sent to a another response along
the same line.
I know of know of no way to make such a "portable app" for better
or worse. I'm not saying there isn't, I'm just not aware of it.
- Dov
> -Original Message-
> From: Art Campbell [mailto:art.cam
Installing Acrobat does NOT install Reader. Adobe Reader is a program
that is a subset of Adobe Acrobat simply for displaying PDF files plus
providing support for a number of other PDF file operations.
Installing Adobe Acrobat installs a "viewer" (the program called "Acrobat")
which is a superset
Installing Acrobat does NOT install Reader. Adobe Reader is a program
that is a subset of Adobe Acrobat simply for displaying PDF files plus
providing support for a number of other PDF file operations.
Installing Adobe Acrobat installs a "viewer" (the program called "Acrobat")
which is a superset
You CAN have Reader and Acrobat at the same time. You CANNOT have two
Acrobats; IOW, two PDF creators.
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Fei Min Lorente
wrote:
> Thanks, Dov! I was experiencing the same problem as Alison, insofar as
> my browser would crash when I tried to look at a PDF in it (jus
hmm yes.
No point in complaining here. There are a few Adobe people but they
would have interest mostly in FrameMaker, except Dov.
I might also suggest you get in touch with Adobe Customer care if you
have a corporate license. Oh and don't expect anyone here to forward
your complaint for yo
But, Dov---
I have both installed so that when a reviewer runs into a problem, I can
"see it their way". The interfaces of the two are so different that
it's sometimes handy to be able to do this.
Would it be any less "NOT RECOMMENDED" if one had the Reader on a
removable drive (such as a USB
Dov,
Although this takes the thread off-topic a bit, is there any way to
configure Reader to be a "portable" ap that runs from a thumb drive?
I certainly don't disagree with your advice about not having Reader on
an Acrobat system, but for many of us that isn't possible -- for
example, if you wor
Although you CAN have both Reader and Acrobat installed simultaneously
(assuming the same version), it is very strongly NOT RECOMMENDED for a
number of very good reasons. It certainly does not add any functionality
to one's system. Having said that, I will add that having both Reader and
Acrobat of
Although you CAN have both Reader and Acrobat installed simultaneously
(assuming the same version), it is very strongly NOT RECOMMENDED for a
number of very good reasons. It certainly does not add any functionality
to one's system. Having said that, I will add that having both Reader and
Acrobat of
Thanks, Dov! I was experiencing the same problem as Alison, insofar as
my browser would crash when I tried to look at a PDF in it (just
clicking on a URL). We ended up working around it by setting the Acrobat
internet preferences to not display PDF in browser. But now that you
mention that you can'
Thanks, Dov! I was experiencing the same problem as Alison, insofar as
my browser would crash when I tried to look at a PDF in it (just
clicking on a URL). We ended up working around it by setting the Acrobat
internet preferences to not display PDF in browser. But now that you
mention that you can'
With all the abbreviations, I'm not sure I even understand what you're
trying to say. For example, does "apps & ills" mean that the
illustrations are all located on your C: drive? What does "EPS 4/c"
mean?
Did you create these EPS files using one application? When you did so
did you create them wi
On Jul 24, 2010, at 6:50 AM, Dr Rick Smith wrote:
> In any case, let me ask how others are running PC versions of Frame on the
> Mac. For a while I wondered why so many people still use Frame 7, but I
> assume it's because lots of people still run it on a Mac.
Not the case. I use Frame 7 on a
VMWare ... what? Player? Workstation? Server, etc?
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Dr Rick Smith wrote:
> On Jul 23, 2010, at 9:31 AM, boe...@gedok.com wrote:
>
>> Hi, there,
>>
>> we here were working as long as possible with our old Framemaker 7 on the
>> mac. Adobe got us on the wrong foot w
35 matches
Mail list logo
