At 15:22 -0400 9/4/13, Fred Ridder wrote:
>I'll admit that the procedure for creating a named graphic object in the
>reference pages is fussy and a little arcane, but once you've set it up it
>works like a champ, especially for graphics that are associated with
>particular paragraph tags. After
At 10:50 -0700 9/4/13, Karen Robbins wrote:
>What am I missing?
As I read it, the help you cite refers to selecting multiple graphical objects
within a single anchored frame. It works. However, if you are trying to select
multiple graphical (anchored) frames within a text flow, flow, I don't th
mes but only two of three graphic frames.
>
> I've tried both the smart arrow cursor and the dumb one.
>
> What am I missing?
>
> Frame 11.0.1.382, Windows 7.
>
> Thanks,
> Karen
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbe
/adobe.ly/Pbdp0J
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130409/9ef2adff/attachment.html>
de vos syst?mes; veuillez ?galement vous abstenir
d'imprimer, de copier, de distribuer ou de lire son contenu.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130409/2b9784d3/attachment.html>
art --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130409/d6ddb29c/attachment.html>
ources and info.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130409/b4f46fd4/attachment.html>
the smart arrow cursor and the dumb one.
What am I missing?
Frame 11.0.1.382, Windows 7.
Thanks,
Karen
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130409/38f7fd4e/attachment.html>
At 15:22 -0400 9/4/13, Fred Ridder wrote:
>I'll admit that the procedure for creating a named graphic object in the
>reference pages is fussy and a little arcane, but once you've set it up it
>works like a champ, especially for graphics that are associated with
>particular paragraph tags. After
Steve Rickaby wrote:
> Also, in theory (although I've never been able to make it work), you should
> be able to reference named graphical objects on a reference page.
I'll admit that the procedure for creating a named graphic object in the
reference pages is fussy and a little arcane, but once
Fred Ridder wrote:
? That help topic is discussing multiple *graphic objects* (within the same
frame or on the same page), not multiple *frames*. Frames are containers that
have their own set of properties that are quite different from the graphic
objects they contain.
Ah, yes! That is true,
At 10:50 -0700 9/4/13, Karen Robbins wrote:
>What am I missing?
As I read it, the help you cite refers to selecting multiple graphical objects
within a single anchored frame. It works. However, if you are trying to select
multiple graphical (anchored) frames within a text flow, flow, I don't th
:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130409/d3f40a52/attachment.html>
dministrative questions to listadmin at frameusers.com. Visit
http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130409/872d47d1/attachment.html>
In FM10, I can select, copy, and paste multiple graphics in or out of
frames, though I can select only one frame at a time.
Hmmm ... not sure what you are experiencing. For me, using a diagonal sweep
works fine for selecting multiple graphics objects. Just have to make sure not
to accidentally grab the text frame.
Could you have a mouse problem? I have noticed that with wireless mice, when
the battery is weak, it se
elements,
ctrl+A grabs all text frames but only two of three graphic frames.
I've tried both the smart arrow cursor and the dumb one.
What am I missing?
Frame 11.0.1.382, Windows 7.
Thanks,
Karen
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http:/
That help topic is discussing multiple *graphic objects* (within the same frame
or on the same page), not multiple *frames*. Frames are containers that have
their own set of properties that are quite different from the graphic objects
they contain.
-Fred Ridder
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 11:50:18
Really? Then why does the online FrameMaker 11 help say (or seem to say)
that you can?
http://help.adobe.com/en_US/framemaker/using/WSd817046a44e105e21e63e3d11ab7f741c8-7ffb.html#WSd817046a44e105e21e63e3d11ab7f741c8-7fe9
And what the heck kind of workflow is that... making you click and
copy/paste
missing?
>
> Frame 11.0.1.382, Windows 7.
>
> Thanks,
> Karen
>
>
>
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130409/41e6b266/attachment.html>
Ctrl-click releases the first-selected graphic to select the second. :-(
--Karen
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Robert Lauriston wrote:
> How about if you select one graphic and then Ctrl-click to select the next?
>
___
You are currently subscribed
rubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130409/1d1334bc/attachment.html>
You can select multiple graphics within an anchored frame.
I never use graphics outside of anchored frames in FM so I don't know
about that case.
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Paul Wilbraham
wrote:
> You cannot select more than one graphic frame, anchored or unanchored, at a
> time.
Karen
You cannot select more than one graphic frame, anchored or unanchored, at a
time.
--Paul Wilbraham
> On 09 April 2013 at 18:50 Karen Robbins wrote:
>
> Hi Framers,
>
> I'm not able to select multiple graphic frame objects. Diagonal dragging to
> encompass the objects with an invisible
How about if you select one graphic and then Ctrl-click to select the next?
Hi Framers,
I'm not able to select multiple graphic frame objects. Diagonal dragging to
encompass the objects with an invisible border only selects the last one
over which the cursor passes. Using the shift-click-drag method gives the
same result. Clicking the individual items' edge, with and with
scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130409/a04bbfa6/attachment.html>
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130409/6364c37c/attachment.html>
Typically when someone says, "If I was xyz" or "if I were xyz" they are
referring to something that is in fact not the case. Which, stricly speaking,
means that "conditional, contrary to fact" is true 100% of the time. I'm
curious if "was" would EVER be appropriate based on that constraint.
Tim
29 matches
Mail list logo
