The subscription model probably does help them deal with piracy. In that
sense, they are urging a part of their user (but not customer) base to be
more obedient.
Craig
From: framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Steve Johnson
Sent:
Adobe provides a software license transfer form. Not applicable to academic
versions, however.
http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/policy-pricing/transfer-product-license.h
tml
Craig
-Original Message-
From: framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com]
The hell you say. The only deadline I've ever missed was the result of
my department's PCs being updated to Word 2003 without warning. There
were bugs that made it impossible to update the headers and footers in
a new features doc that had to be in Word format because marketing had
the final cut.
Missed our #AdobeTCS webinar Towards an Agile authoring methodology: learning
from the Lean methodology?
RECORDING: http://adobe.ly/13xEqF4 -- Guest speaker = Ellis Pratt of Cherryleaf
@ellispratt
__
Maxwell Hoffmann | Product Evangelist | Adobe |
Hello Everybody,
For the record, Adobe has made no announcements about Tech Comm Suite,
FrameMaker or RoboHelp going to subscription only. The announcements discussed
in this thread only involve Creative Suite. The change in future distribution
of Creative Cloud was announced at the Adobe MAX
Friday May 17 Webinar / 9:00 AM PDT (Pacific Time)
Register: http://adobe.ly/129Zte0
One long-standing complaint amongst Word users has been fragile auto-numbers.
Numbered headings and lists has long been one of FrameMaker's greatest
strengths. Join this webinar to discover how (a) simple
Hi Robert,
Your opinion is appreciated and noted. For anyone who would like a summary of
what has changed in FrameMaker since 2002, you can download a PDF document
which contains a matrix of which features were introduced in FM7.2, FM8, FM9
and FM11. Interesting reading.
Here is the link:
Flare doesn't offer anything I need that I don't already have from
FrameMaker and WebWorks, and it lacks some things I find very useful,
such as WYSIWYG editing for continuous PDF preview and the ability to
save change markup to PDF for review.
And neither do the thing I'm most interested in
I appreciate everyone's feedback, but plans to build a
competitive product and business plans for a competitive product may be a bit
premature. ;-)
I strongly disagree. I think it's been a long time coming. I want more choices.
I want to be able to see the text in the index dialog box.
Not sure why you need to doubt my statement--but, let's see...
I use on a regular basis:
Photoshop
Lightroom
InDesign (with DPS)
InCopy (currently I purchase separately, but it will be the new ACC release)
Dreamweaver
Edge Animate/Services
Premiere Pro/Encore
Media Encoder
After Effects
Maxwell, I think you are missing the point.
His comment is in reference to value (however that might be measured) in
the statement I thought was worth paying for, not the fact that
features have been added and added and added, then reshuffled and more
added.
Alan
On 16/05/13 9:52 AM,
Enable and encourage user input in PDFs (viewed with Adobe Reader)
with FrameMaker-to-Acrobat TimeSavers + Form Assistant
Half-hour webinar (free; no fluff, no hype, no nonsense)
Wednesday, June 5, starting 9am PDT
Register at: https://www3.gotomeeting.com/register/157658438
Enabling
How about you doing some reading and making a to-do list of the basic
features that FrameMaker users have been requesting for years?
An easy way to find out what many of those are is to look at the
plug-ins that people are willing to pay for. How are book-level
variables, real templates, and
I don't doubt your statement, I was just curious. I didn't notice that
you do training stuff, that often requires a bigger and broader
toolkit.
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 11:01 AM, David Creamer
ideasli...@ideastraining.com wrote:
Not sure why you need to doubt my statement--but, let's see...
I
Or broken by FM9 and added back in as new features in later releases.
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Alan T Litchfield
a...@alphabyte.co.nz wrote:
Maxwell, I think you are missing the point.
His comment is in reference to value (however that might be measured) in the
statement I thought
An easy way to find out what many of those are is to look at the
plug-ins that people are willing to pay for.
Good point.
Nadine
___
You are currently subscribed to framers as arch...@mail-archive.com.
Send list messages to
Hi,
I've been tasked with finding how to include / import by reference /
text-inset / etc. unstructured (DTIA) content (such as field help
descriptions) in a larger unstructured document (such as in a user guide
chapter). Someone I work with said they saw an Adobe representative
demonstrate
Hi Mike...
DITA files are typically XML, in which case I'm not aware of any way to
import that into an unstructured FM document using standard FM commands.
If the files are structured binary FM files that use the DITA model, you
can use the text inset mechanism to import that file the same as
> I appreciate everyone's feedback, but plans to build a?
> competitive product and business plans for a competitive product may be a bit
> premature.? ;-)
I strongly disagree. I think it's been a long time coming. I want more choices.
I want to be able to see the text in the index dialog
Not sure why you need to doubt my statement--but, let's see...
I use on a regular basis:
Photoshop
Lightroom
InDesign (with DPS)
InCopy (currently I purchase separately, but it will be the new ACC release)
Dreamweaver
Edge Animate/Services
Premiere Pro/Encore
Media Encoder
After Effects
Adobe already controls piracy using activation. The only difference
with the subscription model is that your license has a timeout.
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Craig Ede wrote:
> The subscription model probably does help them deal with piracy. In that
> sense, they are urging a part of
How about you doing some reading and making a to-do list of the basic
features that FrameMaker users have been requesting for years?
An easy way to find out what many of those are is to look at the
plug-ins that people are willing to pay for. How are book-level
variables, real templates, and
I don't doubt your statement, I was just curious. I didn't notice that
you do training stuff, that often requires a bigger and broader
toolkit.
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 11:01 AM, David Creamer
wrote:
> Not sure why you need to doubt my statement--but, let's see...
>
> I use on a regular basis:
>
Or broken by FM9 and added back in as "new features" in later releases.
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Alan T Litchfield
wrote:
> Maxwell, I think you are missing the point.
>
> His comment is in reference to value (however that might be measured) in the
> statement "I thought was worth
>An easy way to find out what many of those are is to look at the
>plug-ins that people are willing to pay for.?
Good point.
Nadine
> >An easy way to find out what many of those are is to look at the
> >plug-ins that people are willing to pay for.
>
> Good point.
>
> Nadine
Indeed a very good point!
For me, book level variables are vital for my specifications ... that is what
BookVars from Leximation provides and has yet
this (or find out that it is not
possible). Any help would be very much appreciated.
Thanks,
Mike
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130516/7c4ea401/attachment.html>
>
> Mike
>
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130516/20de9fef/attachment.html>
28 matches
Mail list logo
