OT: Adobe 'Creative Cloud' (again)

I have just had a software vendor ring me to enquire about my future software needs, and to extol the virtues of Adobe's 'creative cloud', which she had just finished training up on. Boy did she get more than she was bargaining for ;-) I pointed out that I had been planning to upgrade (with

Re: OT: Adobe 'Creative Cloud' (again)

Steve, I'm with you. I used to be a huge Adobe fan. I have loved and praised Adobe software far and wide. It's not cheap, but it is very capable and works very well. Now, I find myself hating Adobe. I'm not just disappointed with the CC subscription model, I'm fuming. I complain about it every

A query regarding $paranum

Dear Framers: My paranum variable is not spitting out the entire string of autonumbers. I am following Fred Ridder's post, viz. In the LOF file, on the LOF reference page, try changing the $paranumonly building block to $paranum. The $paranumonly building block is designed to pick up only the

RE: A query regarding $paranum

I think the two things to look at are whether the properties for the $chapnum system variable are properly set up in the Numbering Properties sheet for each chapter, and whether you have done a Book Update to ensure that the numbering has properly set itself in each file for the book context.

RE: A query regarding $paranum

Robert CH Shell wrote: Here is the PGF: V:Video: $volnum: $chapnum: n+:~ Here is the caption: every element respected Video: 4: 3:2:~The Company hospital Here is the result in the generated list of videos: Video: 4: 1: 2:~ The Company hospital..1879

Correction and reference pages for $paranum query

Dear Framers: There was a typo in my original post as Richard pointed out: I'm confused. Video: 4: 3:2:~ becomes Video: 4: 1: 2:~ but you want it to become Video: 4: 2: 2:~? Richard G. Combs What it should be is: Video: 4: 3: 2:~ The Company hospital..1879 What does

RE: OT: Adobe 'Creative Cloud' (again)

Steve/Mike. I agree with you both thoroughly. In a similar thread some months back, I noted that I was unable to renew my 2-year FrameMaker and Acrobat Pro update license agreement because of a new Adobe policy - I suspect that this was in preparation for a migration to a cloud-based approach

RE: OT: Adobe 'Creative Cloud' (again)

I apologize for helping this topic spill into the FrameMaker arena where, so far, the subscription model has not been forced on us. Hopefully, Adobe won't also make that bad decision or they will find that they have lost the last bit of their revenue stream from me. Given the fact that I

Re: OT: Adobe 'Creative Cloud' (again)

Hi Steve You may know this already, but Xara is a credible alternative to Illustrator, and a lot cheaper. Dunno about any of the others though... Regards, Roger On 12/07/2013 11:46 AM, Steve Rickaby wrote: I have just had a software vendor ring me to enquire about my future software needs,

OT: Adobe 'Creative Cloud' (again)

I have just had a software vendor ring me to enquire about my future software needs, and to extol the virtues of Adobe's 'creative cloud', which she had just finished training up on. Boy did she get more than she was bargaining for ;-) I pointed out that I had been planning to upgrade (with

OT: Adobe 'Creative Cloud' (again)

Steve, I'm with you. I used to be a huge Adobe fan. I have loved and praised Adobe software far and wide. It's not cheap, but it is very capable and works very well. Now, I find myself hating Adobe. I'm not just disappointed with the CC subscription model, I'm fuming. I complain about it every

A query regarding <$paranum>

Dear Framers: My paranum variable is not spitting out the entire string of autonumbers. I am following Fred Ridder's post, viz. In the LOF file, on the LOF reference page, try changing the <$paranumonly> building block to <$paranum>. The <$paranumonly> building block is designed to pick up only

A query regarding <$paranum>

ers-unsubscribe at lists.frameusers.com > or visit > http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/docudoc%40hotmail.com > > Send administrative questions to listadmin at frameusers.com. Visit > http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info. -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130712/bfb61cc2/attachment.html>

A query regarding <$paranum>

Robert CH Shell wrote: > Here is the PGF: > > V:Video: <$volnum>: <$chapnum>: :~ > > Here is the caption: every element respected > > Video: 4: 3:2:~The Company hospital > > Here is the result in the generated list of videos: > > Video: 4: 1: 2:~ The Company

OT: Adobe 'Creative Cloud' (again)

Steve/Mike. I agree with you both thoroughly. In a similar thread some months back, I noted that I was unable to renew my 2-year FrameMaker and Acrobat Pro update license agreement because of a new Adobe policy - I suspect that this was in preparation for a migration to a cloud-based approach

OT: Adobe 'Creative Cloud' (again)

> I apologize for helping this topic spill into the FrameMaker arena where, so > far, the subscription model has not been forced on us. > Hopefully, Adobe won't also make that bad decision or they will find that > they have lost the last bit of their revenue stream from me. Given the fact that

OT: Adobe 'Creative Cloud' (again)

Hi Steve You may know this already, but Xara is a credible alternative to Illustrator, and a lot cheaper. Dunno about any of the others though... Regards, Roger On 12/07/2013 11:46 AM, Steve Rickaby wrote: > I have just had a software vendor ring me to enquire about my future software >