On Sun, 4 Aug 2013 16:20:31 -0400, John Sgammato
wrote:
>I have no [OmniHelpOptions] at all.
>I renamed the HTML version, changing nothing but the name.
>That failed, so I tried editing Config= to point to he OmniHelp file -
>see below.
>I know something's not right, but I don't understand this
On Sun, 4 Aug 2013 15:50:36 -0400, John Sgammato
wrote:
>I've got 14 oh*.js files, all of them old, and
>none of them AppManager_OHC.js
Then something isn't set up right for the OH project.
If you have set [OmniHelpOptions]ProjectName, it will
use that instead of the book name, but that's not
On Sun, 4 Aug 2013 13:56:49 -0400, John Sgammato
wrote:
>I am making progress, but I cannot find an AppManager _ohc.js or any
>other _ohc.js file. I can't see any new .js files anywhere in the
>project. I got OmniHelp output.
>Do I have to turn it on somewhere?
No, it's definitely there. The n
On Sun, 4 Aug 2013 16:20:31 -0400, John Sgammato
wrote:
>I have no [OmniHelpOptions] at all.
>I renamed the HTML version, changing nothing but the name.
>That failed, so I tried editing Config= to point to he OmniHelp file -
>see below.
>I know something's not right, but I don't understand this
On Sun, 4 Aug 2013 15:50:36 -0400, John Sgammato
wrote:
>I've got 14 oh*.js files, all of them old, and
>none of them AppManager_OHC.js
Then something isn't set up right for the OH project.
If you have set [OmniHelpOptions]ProjectName, it will
use that instead of the book name, but that's not
On Sun, 4 Aug 2013 13:56:49 -0400, John Sgammato
wrote:
>I am making progress, but I cannot find an AppManager _ohc.js or any
>other _ohc.js file. I can't see any new .js files anywhere in the
>project. I got OmniHelp output.
>Do I have to turn it on somewhere?
No, it's definitely there. The n
On Sun, 4 Aug 2013 01:14:59 -0400, John Sgammato
wrote:
>Ah! I guess I could just conditionalize the
>knowledge base and non-kb content...
>It took too long to think of that :(
That would be the most robust method, and
probably the quickest. I'd suggest that you
conditionalize the NON-KB part
On Sun, 4 Aug 2013 01:14:59 -0400, John Sgammato
wrote:
>Ah! I guess I could just conditionalize the
>knowledge base and non-kb content...
>It took too long to think of that :(
That would be the most robust method, and
probably the quickest. I'd suggest that you
conditionalize the NON-KB part
