Yeah...that works.
I was apprehensive to go with Conditions, having not used in 10+ years.
However, just like riding a bike.
On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 6:25 PM Doug wrote:
> I agree with Lin. Use conditional tags for the authors.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 3:20 PM Lin Sims wrote:
>
> > At a
I agree with Lin. Use conditional tags for the authors.
On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 3:20 PM Lin Sims wrote:
> At a first glance? What I'd do is assign a condition to each author and
> then generate a book that has only their condition turned on.
>
>
___
To me that's just making extra work for myself and anyone else who
ever works on the project.
In the bad old days, you couldn't put a whole book in a single .fm
file because you'd run out of memory or disk space.
On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 2:55 PM wrote:
>
> I did mention that my numbering was for
I did mention that my numbering was for books (meaning Frame books), since
that is where chapnum works.
Naturally, I would approach an all-chapters in one document differently than
a multi-chapter/document job, but I reserve the all-in-one doc files for
smaller documents.
As they say, to each
At a first glance? What I'd do is assign a condition to each author and
then generate a book that has only their condition turned on.
On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 3:15 PM John Posada wrote:
> Stipulation...no scripts and I'm using FM19.
>
> I have a Book with currently, now, about 400 files, though I
Stipulation...no scripts and I'm using FM19.
I have a Book with currently, now, about 400 files, though I believe I've
only scratched the surface.
Each file contains content that was sucked in from various locations,
written by various authors, between 2014 and current.
In effect, it is a
Winfried,
I agree with you about avoiding chapnum, etc. You are correct that
using counters is more flexible because it allows multiple chapters,
sections, or volumes to appear either in separate documents or grouped
into one. Furthermore, I find using counters easier to maintain since
Thanks!
On Sun, Jan 5, 2020 at 7:12 PM wrote:
> >So, have you found any drawbacks to this approach, other than the problem
> of getting other users to refer to the reference page?
>
> The only problem I've run into is when an extra heading needs to be added
> in--assuming you want all the
Hi,
In a previous job the figure numbers and table numbers
were a combination of the chapter number and a running
number in this file:
Figure x-x
Table x-x
This works only, when the figure and table format use the
same series as heading1.
This is an argument for a single all-in-one numbering
