At 11:04 -0400 24/8/06, eric.dunn at ca.transport.bombardier.com wrote:
>Another tangent: Were either the Illustrator or FrameMaker displayed colours
>IDENTICAL to the printed output?
No, but the Illustrator color was a lot more identical than the FrameMaker
color, which was way, way off.
>I s
At 11:04 -0400 24/8/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Another tangent: Were either the Illustrator or FrameMaker displayed colours
>IDENTICAL to the printed output?
No, but the Illustrator color was a lot more identical than the FrameMaker
color, which was way, way off.
>I suspect both were "incor
Steve Rickaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 08/24/2006
04:39:40 AM:
> When both the imported
> Illustrator work and the FrameMaker files were combined and output
> to PDF, the two 'different' colors appeared the same, and correct.
Another tangent: Were either the Illustrator or FrameMaker displa
Steve Rickaby wrote on 08/24/2006
04:39:40 AM:
> When both the imported
> Illustrator work and the FrameMaker files were combined and output
> to PDF, the two 'different' colors appeared the same, and correct.
Another tangent: Were either the Illustrator or FrameMaker displayed
colours IDENTI
At 16:35 -0400 23/8/06, eric.dunn at ca.transport.bombardier.com wrote:
>Welcome to the (hellish) world of colourmatching. Fussing with the colour
>on screen is virtually meaningless. If the two are supposed to be the
>same, they SHOULD be the same. If they are displaying differently, they
>undoub
t; Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 09:39:40 +0100
> To:
> Subject: Re: CMYK Images in Frame
>
> At 16:35 -0400 23/8/06, eric.dunn at ca.transport.bombardier.com wrote:
>
>> Welcome to the (hellish) world of colourmatching. Fussing with the colour
>> on screen is virtually mea
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 09:39:40 +0100
> To:
> Subject: Re: CMYK Images in Frame
>
> At 16:35 -0400 23/8/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Welcome to the (hellish) world of colourmatching. Fussing with the colour
>> on screen is virtually meani
At 16:35 -0400 23/8/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Welcome to the (hellish) world of colourmatching. Fussing with the colour
>on screen is virtually meaningless. If the two are supposed to be the
>same, they SHOULD be the same. If they are displaying differently, they
>undoubtedly are different and
Framers wrote on 08/22/2006 03:52:23 PM:
> The bottom line is I have a client who doesn't want to send his files
out to
> the printer but print them on a color printer.
Welcome to the (hellish) world of colourmatching. Fussing with the colour
on screen is virtually meaningless. If the two are s
Framers wrote on 08/22/2006 03:52:23 PM:
> The bottom line is I have a client who doesn't want to send his files
out to
> the printer but print them on a color printer.
Welcome to the (hellish) world of colourmatching. Fussing with the colour
on screen is virtually meaningless. If the two are s
I have two cmyk images that I copied into Framemaker 7.2 on the PC. They are
both made by Makita. Makita's color is a teal/aqua color.
One image looks teal/aqua in color like it should in Frame, however, the
other image looks like Seafoam -- a greenish, blueish color. In photoshop
the images are sl
I have two cmyk images that I copied into Framemaker 7.2 on the PC. They are
both made by Makita. Makita's color is a teal/aqua color.
One image looks teal/aqua in color like it should in Frame, however, the
other image looks like Seafoam -- a greenish, blueish color. In photoshop
the images are sl
12 matches
Mail list logo
