o the approach Art suggested, I'd be interested to learn
>about it and consider going that route.
>
>Regards,
>Jim
>
>-Original Message-
>From: knowhowpro at gmail.com [mailto:knowhowpro at gmail.com] On Behalf Of
>Peter Gold
>Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009
On Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:55:18 +, "Christopher Seal"
wrote:
>I had an instance where I had to replicate a published report, and that
>report had Tables with footnotes as part of the regular footnote sequence.
>In FM this was not possible so I faked it as follows. I created a real
>footnote
On Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:55:18 +, "Christopher Seal"
wrote:
>I had an instance where I had to replicate a published report, and that
>report had Tables with footnotes as part of the regular footnote sequence.
>In FM this was not possible so I faked it as follows. I created a real
>footnote
No problem, Peter. Thanks for thinking it over :)
-Original Message-
From: knowhowpro at gmail.com [mailto:knowhow...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
Peter Gold
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 1:33 PM
To: Pinkham, Jim
Cc: Art Campbell; framers at lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: Footnote Out of
Hi, Jim:
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Pinkham, Jim wrote:
> Hi, Peter --
>
> Thanks for taking this on. The sequence is 1,2,2,1. The first three are
> fine. The second 2 is indeed accomplished by the cross-reference
> technique. The only thing I had expected, based on the marked-up manual
> I'
al Message-
From: knowhowpro at gmail.com [mailto:knowhow...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
Peter Gold
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 12:15 PM
To: Art Campbell
Cc: Pinkham, Jim; framers at lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: Footnote Out of Sequence
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Pinkham, Jim
wrote
Because these are _table_ footnotes instead of textual footnotes, the
numbering should reset with each new table, as far as I know, because
each table is a discrete entity. If you have to fake it out (which I
wouldn't recommend, but which you may be able to get away with if
you're not following a s
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Pinkham, Jim wrote:
>> I have a series of footnotes associated with tables on the same page.
>> The first and second are normal. The third references the same footnote
>> as the second. Because the precedent is not to add an identical footnote
>> and call it 3, th
: Footnote Out of Sequence
Because these are _table_ footnotes instead of textual footnotes, the
numbering should reset with each new table, as far as I know, because
each table is a discrete entity. If you have to fake it out (which I
wouldn't recommend, but which you may be able to get away
approach Art suggested, I'd be interested to learn
>about it and consider going that route.
>
>Regards,
>Jim
>
>-Original Message-
>From: knowhow...@gmail.com [mailto:knowhow...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
>Peter Gold
>Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 12:15 PM
&
No problem, Peter. Thanks for thinking it over :)
-Original Message-
From: knowhow...@gmail.com [mailto:knowhow...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
Peter Gold
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 1:33 PM
To: Pinkham, Jim
Cc: Art Campbell; framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: Footnote Out of
Hi, Jim:
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Pinkham, Jim wrote:
> Hi, Peter --
>
> Thanks for taking this on. The sequence is 1,2,2,1. The first three are
> fine. The second 2 is indeed accomplished by the cross-reference
> technique. The only thing I had expected, based on the marked-up manual
> I'
I have a series of footnotes associated with tables on the same page.
The first and second are normal. The third references the same footnote
as the second. Because the precedent is not to add an identical footnote
and call it 3, this is accomplished by a cross-reference to the third
footnote. Howe
al Message-
From: knowhow...@gmail.com [mailto:knowhow...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
Peter Gold
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 12:15 PM
To: Art Campbell
Cc: Pinkham, Jim; framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: Footnote Out of Sequence
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Pinkham, Jim
wrote:
&
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Pinkham, Jim wrote:
>> I have a series of footnotes associated with tables on the same page.
>> The first and second are normal. The third references the same footnote
>> as the second. Because the precedent is not to add an identical footnote
>> and call it 3, th
: Footnote Out of Sequence
Because these are _table_ footnotes instead of textual footnotes, the
numbering should reset with each new table, as far as I know, because
each table is a discrete entity. If you have to fake it out (which I
wouldn't recommend, but which you may be able to get away wi
Because these are _table_ footnotes instead of textual footnotes, the
numbering should reset with each new table, as far as I know, because
each table is a discrete entity. If you have to fake it out (which I
wouldn't recommend, but which you may be able to get away with if
you're not following a s
I have a series of footnotes associated with tables on the same page.
The first and second are normal. The third references the same footnote
as the second. Because the precedent is not to add an identical footnote
and call it 3, this is accomplished by a cross-reference to the third
footnote. Howe
18 matches
Mail list logo