Just so everyone on this list has an idea of what
one alternative method of posting to a list looks
like, I've included the principle headers from
another list to which I subscribe. Mind you, my
subscription is set up to receive "digests"
several times daily rather than individual
postings as
Just so everyone on this list has an idea of what
one alternative method of posting to a list looks
like, I've included the principle headers from
another list to which I subscribe. Mind you, my
subscription is set up to receive "digests"
several times daily rather than individual
postings as
Paul Findon wrote:
> What normally happens to me with Framers is that I reply to a message
> with some info that I believe will of interest to other Framers and
> may trigger a response, or I add a new sub question. Then, after
> several days I remember the thread and wonder why no one has
> respo
Ayup. I can understand the rationale for it, but this is the only list to
which I am subscribed that replies in this way.
And, you know, I just about did it again with this post :/
Alan
Hedley Finger wrote:
> Paul Findon wrote:
>
>> What normally happens to me with Framers is that I reply to a m
e want?
Regards,
Z
> -Original Message-
> From: framers-bounces at lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-bounces at lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of
> Hedley Finger
> Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2008 4:36 PM
> Cc: Framers
> Subject: Re: Haven't we learnt anything about usability? [
> May I simply suggest that you and Paul (and others who want that e-mail
> client behavior) simply do a "Reply to All" *each and every time* you
> want to reply to a Frame Users List message, and you will get the effect
> you want?
Actually, it doesn't give us the effect we want at all. Not that
Hi, Mike.
> > May I simply suggest that you and Paul (and others who want that
e-mail
> > client behavior) simply do a "Reply to All" *each and every time*
you
> > want to reply to a Frame Users List message, and you will get the
effect
> > you want?
>
> Actually, it doesn't give us the effect we
Mike Bradley wrote:
> Actually, it doesn't give us the effect we want at all. Not that I'm
> religious
> about it, but with Reply to All, the sender of the message to which I
> reply gets
> two copies, one sent to him/her and one to the list. This doubles the
> Internet
> traffic needlessly, where
On 19 May 2008, at 21:16, Mike Bradley wrote:
>> Does this list have a moderator? Could you poll the list so that
>> we can settle
> this the democratic way?
I think Lisa Bronson took over as list mom in 2005. Before that it
was Bradley Anderson. Neither have posted anything to this list for
lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Paul Findon
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 8:13 AM
To: Framers
Subject: Re: Haven't we learnt anything about usability? [was"Re:
default"reply-to-all" "]
On 19 May 2008, at 21:16, Mike Bradley wrote:
>> Does this list have a moderator?
-Original Message-
> From: framers-bounces at lists.frameusers.com
> [mailto:framers-bounces at lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Paul Findon
> Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 8:13 AM
> To: Framers
> Subject: Re: Haven't we learnt anything about usability? [was"Re:
> default"
Or - and this may just me thinking crazy again - pay attention when
replying to a list message.
Seriously folks, this is getting silly. I'm on more mailing lists than
I can count on my fingers and toes, and they don't all behave the
same. Exercising 2 seconds worth of discipline to figure out wher
All:
>> Hedley is not asking for a "reply-to-all." What he, I and, no doubt,
>> > others want is "reply-to-list." In other words, when you click your
>> > Reply button, by default, messages are addressed to the list.
>>
>
> You're making a distinction without a difference. Alan and Jeremy
> w
Paul Findon wrote:
> What normally happens to me with Framers is that I reply to a message
> with some info that I believe will of interest to other Framers and
> may trigger a response, or I add a new sub question. Then, after
> several days I remember the thread and wonder why no one has
> respo
Ayup. I can understand the rationale for it, but this is the only list to
which I am subscribed that replies in this way.
And, you know, I just about did it again with this post :/
Alan
Hedley Finger wrote:
> Paul Findon wrote:
>
>> What normally happens to me with Framers is that I reply to a m
All:
>> Hedley is not asking for a "reply-to-all." What he, I and, no doubt,
>> > others want is "reply-to-list." In other words, when you click your
>> > Reply button, by default, messages are addressed to the list.
>>
>
> You're making a distinction without a difference. Alan and Jeremy
> w
e want?
Regards,
Z
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Hedley Finger
> Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2008 4:36 PM
> Cc: Framers
> Subject: Re: Haven't we learnt anything about usability? [was "Re:
default"reply-to-all" &qu
> May I simply suggest that you and Paul (and others who want that e-mail
> client behavior) simply do a "Reply to All" *each and every time* you
> want to reply to a Frame Users List message, and you will get the effect
> you want?
Actually, it doesn't give us the effect we want at all. Not that
Hi, Mike.
> > May I simply suggest that you and Paul (and others who want that
e-mail
> > client behavior) simply do a "Reply to All" *each and every time*
you
> > want to reply to a Frame Users List message, and you will get the
effect
> > you want?
>
> Actually, it doesn't give us the effect we
Mike Bradley wrote:
> Actually, it doesn't give us the effect we want at all. Not that I'm
> religious
> about it, but with Reply to All, the sender of the message to which I
> reply gets
> two copies, one sent to him/her and one to the list. This doubles the
> Internet
> traffic needlessly, wher
On 19 May 2008, at 21:16, Mike Bradley wrote:
>> Does this list have a moderator? Could you poll the list so that
>> we can settle
> this the democratic way?
I think Lisa Bronson took over as list mom in 2005. Before that it
was Bradley Anderson. Neither have posted anything to this list for
Findon
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 8:13 AM
To: Framers
Subject: Re: Haven't we learnt anything about usability? [was"Re:
default"reply-to-all" "]
On 19 May 2008, at 21:16, Mike Bradley wrote:
>> Does this list have a moderator? Could you poll the list so that
>&g
9
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Findon
> Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 8:13 AM
> To: Framers
> Subject: Re: Haven't we learnt anything about usability? [was"Re:
> default"reply-to-all" "
Or - and this may just me thinking crazy again - pay attention when
replying to a list message.
Seriously folks, this is getting silly. I'm on more mailing lists than
I can count on my fingers and toes, and they don't all behave the
same. Exercising 2 seconds worth of discipline to figure out wher
<>
All:
>> Hedley is not asking for a "reply-to-all." What he, I and, no doubt,
>> > others want is "reply-to-list." In other words, when you click your
>> > Reply button, by default, messages are addressed to the list.
>>
>
> You're making a distinction without a difference. Alan and Jeremy
Old dogs... ;-)
--
Bill Swallow
HATT List Owner
WWP-Users List Owner
Senior Member STC, TechValley Chapter
STC Single-Sourcing SIG Manager
http://techcommdood.blogspot.com
<>
All:
>> Hedley is not asking for a "reply-to-all." What he, I and, no doubt,
>> > others want is "reply-to-list." In other words, when you click your
>> > Reply button, by default, messages are addressed to the list.
>>
>
> You're making a distinction without a difference. Alan and Jeremy
Old dogs... ;-)
--
Bill Swallow
HATT List Owner
WWP-Users List Owner
Senior Member STC, TechValley Chapter
STC Single-Sourcing SIG Manager
http://techcommdood.blogspot.com
___
You are currently subscribed to Framers as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send list mes
28 matches
Mail list logo
