The problem is that if you have a LOT of rows, it won't work.
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 10:15 AM, David Artman wrote:
> While we're talking underlying theory/structure: I suspect many tables in
> which one wants to conditionalize a column could be refactored so that the
> columns were instead rows,
While we're talking underlying theory/structure: I suspect many tables in which one wants to conditionalize a column could be refactored so that the columns were instead rows, which are conditionable.
Thoughts?
Yes, theoretically, if you didn't have spanned cells, you could hide/show the cells
I think it's basically for the same reason that you can't easily
comment out a table column in HTML. Unlike a table row, a column is
not a continuous set of elements. It's one set of elements for each
row in the table.
Implementing column-level conditions would thus be a much larger
challenge than
Hi Lin...
I think it has to do with the ability to have spanned cells. But also I
don't think that you can conditionalize a cell object. You can
conditionalize the content within a cell, but you can't just "remove"
(hide) a cell in a table. You'd have a hole.
Yes, theoretically, if you didn'
Playing with Frame12's (yes, we FINALLY got to upgrade) new conditional tag
interface, and something occurred to me that has before but I never got
around to asking.
WHY can't Frame apply conditional tags to table columns? It's not a feature
I particularly need (although there's been a time or two
