Very interesting topic, and quite a funny anecdote about ET pigeonholing tech
writers. We have 4 levels in our templates, including the chapter title, but
usually avoid going down to 4. So most content is under
1 Chapter Title (actually a Heading 1)
1.2 Heading 2
1.2.3 Heading 3
For our type of
Very interesting topic, and quite a funny anecdote about ET pigeonholing tech
writers. We have 4 levels in our templates, including the chapter title, but
usually avoid going down to 4. So most content is under
1 Chapter Title (actually a Heading 1)
1.2 Heading 2
1.2.3 Heading 3
For our type of
If you require many sub-levels, it's usually an indication of either:
* You are documenting a very poorly designed product or procedure, or
* You are trying to group too much under one umbrella.
--
Bill Swallow
Twitter: @techcommdood
Blog: http://techcommdood.com
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.co
If you require many sub-levels, it's usually an indication of either:
* You are documenting a very poorly designed product or procedure, or
* You are trying to group too much under one umbrella.
--
Bill Swallow
Twitter: @techcommdood
Blog: http://techcommdood.com
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.co
framers at lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: OT: Heading levels in a UG
I think that a UG should not have more than 4 heading levels. More
the?heading levels, more the user will be forced to scroll up and down or
click the expand all/collapse all button if it is going to be converted into
onl
c: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: OT: Heading levels in a UG
I think that a UG should not have more than 4 heading levels. More
the heading levels, more the user will be forced to scroll up and down or
click the expand all/collapse all button if it is going to be converted into
onl
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Peter Gold wrote:
> I guess Tufte didn't verbally indicate "*" and "" with his comment.
> His methods of providing multiple layers of information - sparklines,
> common measurement references across graphics that vary in scale, and
> various graphic schemes that i
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 7:31 AM, Lin Sims wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 3:25 AM, Evanth,
> Henrik wrote:
>> Hi All
>>
>> I have an off-topic question that may or may not interest you.
>>
>> We are having a discussion at the office regarding the maximum levels of
>> heading that a User guide/Use
Hi All
I have an off-topic question that may or may not interest you.
We are having a discussion at the office regarding the maximum levels of
heading that a User guide/User manual can/should contain. Do you know of any
best practice rules that define how deep a publication should/could be.
P
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 3:25 AM, Evanth,
Henrik wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I have an off-topic question that may or may not interest you.
>
> We are having a discussion at the office regarding the maximum levels of
> heading that a User guide/User manual can/should contain. Do you know of any
> best pra
I agree, four is as many as you need (and, I believe the most I've
ever seen in a published book) -- if you think you need more, it may
be because of an organizational problem.
Art Campbell
art.campbell at gmail.com
"... In my opinion, there's nothing in this world beats a '52
Vin
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Peter Gold wrote:
> I guess Tufte didn't verbally indicate "*" and "" with his comment.
> His methods of providing multiple layers of information - sparklines,
> common measurement references across graphics that vary in scale, and
> various graphic schemes that i
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 7:31 AM, Lin Sims wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 3:25 AM, Evanth,
> Henrik wrote:
>> Hi All
>>
>> I have an off-topic question that may or may not interest you.
>>
>> We are having a discussion at the office regarding the maximum levels of
>> heading that a User guide/Use
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 3:25 AM, Evanth,
Henrik wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I have an off-topic question that may or may not interest you.
>
> We are having a discussion at the office regarding the maximum levels of
> heading that a User guide/User manual can/should contain. Do you know of any
> best pra
I agree, four is as many as you need (and, I believe the most I've
ever seen in a published book) -- if you think you need more, it may
be because of an organizational problem.
Art Campbell
art.campb...@gmail.com
"... In my opinion, there's nothing in this world beats a '52
Vincen
can help you clear all types of interviews
Regards,
N. Jain
http://www.neerajjain8.com
From: "Evanth, Henrik"
To: "framers@lists.frameusers.com"
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 12:55:30 PM
Subject: OT: Heading levels in a UG
Hi All
can help you clear all types of interviews
Regards,
N. Jain
http://www.neerajjain8.com
?
?
From: "Evanth, Henrik"
To: "framers at lists.frameusers.com"
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 12:55:30 PM
Subject: OT: Heading levels in a UG
H
Hi All
I have an off-topic question that may or may not interest you.
We are having a discussion at the office regarding the maximum levels of
heading that a User guide/User manual can/should contain. Do you know of any
best practice rules that define how deep a publication should/could be.
P
18 matches
Mail list logo
