-Original Message-
From: Dov Isaacs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 3:19 PM
To: Charles Beck; framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: Acrobatlateral thinking : Implement simultaneous
multiplereleases [was RE: Adobe Acrobat Reader 8.0]
Your insinuation that I
-Original Message-
From: Dov Isaacs [mailto:isa...@adobe.com]
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 3:19 PM
To: Charles Beck; framers at lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: Acrobatlateral thinking : Implement simultaneous
multiplereleases [was "RE: Adobe Acrobat Reader 8.0"]
Your i
thinking : Implement simultaneous multiple
releases [was RE: Adobe Acrobat Reader 8.0]
Tina:
I would think it would be very difficult to get multiple version
working together that do not interfere with each other.
Difficult, but not impossible. Software manufacturers should not blame
their customers
: Monday, November 06, 2006 5:23 AM
To: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: Acrobatlateral thinking : Implement simultaneous
multiplereleases [was RE: Adobe Acrobat Reader 8.0]
FWIW, what you say should work for Acrobat does work for me
now. I have been using this approach for a number
Dov and all:
> This is a good time, though, to
> repeat my warning that you should not attempt to have
> either multiple versions of Acrobat, multiple versions
> of Reader, and/or mixtures of Acrobat and Reader installed
> on a given system. Although it is possible to coerce the
> installers to
Tina:
> I would think it would be very difficult to get multiple
> version working together that do not interfere with each other.
Difficult, but not impossible. Software manufacturers should not blame
their customers and put problems on their shoulders that can easily (or
difficultly) be
om: Charles Beck
> Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 5:23 AM
> To: framers at lists.frameusers.com
> Subject: RE: Acrobatlateral thinking : Implement simultaneous
> multiplereleases [was "RE: Adobe Acrobat Reader 8.0"]
>
> FWIW, what you say should work for Acroba
At 00:37 -0700 5/11/06, Graeme Forbes wrote:
you can easily set a default. I run Acro5, full version, and Acro7 Pro
(default), on the same machines, but the solution to having them cohabit
peacefully may be that Acro5 is set to open as a classic application.
Ditto here with Acrobat 5 and 6,
Dov and all:
This is a good time, though, to
repeat my warning that you should not attempt to have
either multiple versions of Acrobat, multiple versions
of Reader, and/or mixtures of Acrobat and Reader installed
on a given system. Although it is possible to coerce the
installers to do
Tina:
I would think it would be very difficult to get multiple
version working together that do not interfere with each other.
Difficult, but not impossible. Software manufacturers should not blame
their customers and put problems on their shoulders that can easily (or
difficultly) be
[mailto:framers-bounces+poole_tina_l=cat.com at lists.frameusers.com]On
Behalf Of hedley.finger at myob.com
Sent: Monday, 6 November 2006 8:24 AM
To: framers at lists.frameusers.com; framers at omsys.com
Subject: Acrobatlateral thinking : Implement simultaneous multiple
releases [was "RE: Adobe Ac
Dov wrote:
The problems that I mention are more prevalent under Windows
than on Mac
which sounds about right. But although
even the Mac has issues with such parallel
installations. Some program must respond to double clicks
to open/process files from the user interface
you can easily set a
Expect it very soon. This is a good time, though, to
repeat my warning that you should not attempt to have
either multiple versions of Acrobat, multiple versions
of Reader, and/or mixtures of Acrobat and Reader installed
on a given system. Although it is possible to coerce the
installers to do
.
Is this true?
Thank you,
Gillian Flato
-Original Message-
From: Dov Isaacs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 9:37 AM
To: Gillian Flato; framers@FrameUsers.com
Subject: RE: Adobe Acrobat Reader 8.0
Expect it very soon. This is a good time, though, to
repeat my warning
Good info!
But be aware that this link is for Acrobat Pro 8.0 ... not Acrobat Reader 8.0
(like the original requester asked).
Z
Art Campbell wrote:
Press release on the Adobe site dated yesterday 11/02 says immediate
availability.
Eval version is available at:
At 09:37 -0800 3/11/06, Dov Isaacs wrote:
This is a good time, though, to repeat my warning that you should not attempt
to have either multiple versions of Acrobat, multiple versions of Reader,
and/or mixtures of Acrobat and Reader installed on a given system.
Why, Dov? Reader, surely, is a
to the reader/editor tool that comes in the full tool
suite.
My opinions only; I don't speak for Intel.
Fred Ridder
Intel
Parsippany, NJ
From: Syed Zaeem Hosain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Art Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: framers@frameusers.com
Subject: Re: Adobe Acrobat
; framers@FrameUsers.com
Subject: RE: Adobe Acrobat Reader 8.0
Dov,
The reason we want our colleagues to upgrade to Reader 8.0,
which is the only software they have on their systems, is
because the digital signature function doesn't work in Reader
7.0. I created a form in Acrobat Professional
.
- Dov
-Original Message-
From: Steve Rickaby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 9:54 AM
To: Dov Isaacs; Gillian Flato; framers@FrameUsers.com
Subject: RE: Adobe Acrobat Reader 8.0
At 09:37 -0800 3/11/06, Dov Isaacs wrote:
This is a good time, though
19 matches
Mail list logo
