On 5 Dec 2005, at 19:03, Joe Malin wrote:
They would be bigger than JPG.
Are you suggesting that GIF or JPG are *not* used by publishing
professionals?
No, I'm just saying that pro print publishers generally prefer EPS and
TIFF because of their heritage and foolproof output on PostScript
AM
To: Joe Malin
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; framers@lists.FrameUsers.com
Subject: Re: FM bloat (NO PDF)
On 5 Dec 2005, at 19:03, Joe Malin wrote:
They would be bigger than JPG.
Are you suggesting that GIF or JPG are *not* used by publishing
professionals?
No, I'm just saying that pro print
On 5 Dec 2005, at 15:38, Rene S. wrote:
Thanks, Joe, I checked, but that's not the problem. I still can't
figure out what's making this FM file bloat to over 25 MB when I
insert a JPG that's barely over half a MB. This JPG is making the FM
file about 41 times the size of the JPG!! Outrageous!
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Rene S.Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 7:38 AMTo:
framers@lists.FrameUsers.comSubject: RE: FM bloat (NO
PDF)
Thanks, Joe, I checked, but that's not the problem. I
still can't figure out what's making this FM file bloat to over 25 MB when I
insert a JPG that's
. ;-)
Rene
-Original Message-
From: Paul Findon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 11:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: framers@lists.FrameUsers.com
Subject: Re: FM bloat (NO PDF)
On 5 Dec 2005, at 15:38, Rene S. wrote:
Thanks, Joe, I checked, but that's
