Or - and this may just me thinking crazy again - pay attention when
replying to a list message.
Seriously folks, this is getting silly. I'm on more mailing lists than
I can count on my fingers and toes, and they don't all behave the
same. Exercising 2 seconds worth of discipline to figure out wher
9
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Findon
> Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 8:13 AM
> To: Framers
> Subject: Re: Haven't we learnt anything about usability? [was"Re:
> default"reply-to-all" "
Findon
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 8:13 AM
To: Framers
Subject: Re: Haven't we learnt anything about usability? [was"Re:
default"reply-to-all" "]
On 19 May 2008, at 21:16, Mike Bradley wrote:
>> Does this list have a moderator? Could you poll the list so that
>&g
On 19 May 2008, at 21:16, Mike Bradley wrote:
>> Does this list have a moderator? Could you poll the list so that
>> we can settle
> this the democratic way?
I think Lisa Bronson took over as list mom in 2005. Before that it
was Bradley Anderson. Neither have posted anything to this list for
Mike Bradley wrote:
> Actually, it doesn't give us the effect we want at all. Not that I'm
> religious
> about it, but with Reply to All, the sender of the message to which I
> reply gets
> two copies, one sent to him/her and one to the list. This doubles the
> Internet
> traffic needlessly, wher
Hi, Mike.
> > May I simply suggest that you and Paul (and others who want that
e-mail
> > client behavior) simply do a "Reply to All" *each and every time*
you
> > want to reply to a Frame Users List message, and you will get the
effect
> > you want?
>
> Actually, it doesn't give us the effect we
Just so everyone on this list has an idea of what
one alternative method of posting to a list looks
like, I've included the principle headers from
another list to which I subscribe. Mind you, my
subscription is set up to receive "digests"
several times daily rather than individual
postings as
> May I simply suggest that you and Paul (and others who want that e-mail
> client behavior) simply do a "Reply to All" *each and every time* you
> want to reply to a Frame Users List message, and you will get the effect
> you want?
Actually, it doesn't give us the effect we want at all. Not that
e want?
Regards,
Z
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Hedley Finger
> Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2008 4:36 PM
> Cc: Framers
> Subject: Re: Haven't we learnt anything about usability? [was "Re:
default"reply-to-all" &qu
Ayup. I can understand the rationale for it, but this is the only list to
which I am subscribed that replies in this way.
And, you know, I just about did it again with this post :/
Alan
Hedley Finger wrote:
> Paul Findon wrote:
>
>> What normally happens to me with Framers is that I reply to a m
Paul Findon wrote:
> What normally happens to me with Framers is that I reply to a message
> with some info that I believe will of interest to other Framers and
> may trigger a response, or I add a new sub question. Then, after
> several days I remember the thread and wonder why no one has
> respo
11 matches
Mail list logo