Re: Minor typos and the QA guy/scrummaster

2012-07-19 Thread jackdeland
- From: "Marguerite Krupp" To: jackdel...@comcast.net, "framers" Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 10:13:08 AM Subject: Re: Minor typos and the QA guy/scrummaster Not to be too picky, but why is the ScrumMaster, whose role is to be a facilitator, getting tied in knots over t

Re: Minor typos and the QA guy/scrummaster

2012-07-19 Thread Marguerite Krupp
Not to be too picky, but why is the ScrumMaster, whose role is to be a facilitator, getting tied in knots over typos? That's not his role in a true Agile environment. Just a thought! Marguerite ___ You are currently subscribed to framers as arch...@m

Re: Minor typos and the QA guy/scrummaster

2012-07-19 Thread jackdeland
I think maybe a summary rather than a link to ALL the comments here. ;-) - Original Message - From: "Peter Courlis" To: "Mike Wickham" , framers@lists.frameusers.com Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 1:12:56 PM Subject: Re: Minor typos and the QA guy/scrummaster

Re: Minor typos and the QA guy/scrummaster

2012-07-19 Thread Marguerite Krupp
ed, was a "typo." FWIW, Marguerite From: Lin Sims To: jackdel...@comcast.net Cc: framers Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 10:12 AM Subject: Re: Minor typos and the QA guy/scrummaster To be fair, you CAN save it elsewhere, and it's probable that you can set the opt

Re: Minor typos and the QA guy/scrummaster

2012-07-19 Thread jackdeland
I think #2 would be the most convincing for him. We are big on security. Jack - Original Message - From: "Lin Sims" To: jackdel...@comcast.net Cc: "framers" Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 8:42:01 AM Subject: Re: Minor typos and the QA guy/scrummaster Well

Re: Minor typos and the QA guy/scrummaster

2012-07-19 Thread jackdeland
Depends on the output! :) - Original Message - From: "Jeff Coatsworth" To: "framers" Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 8:35:01 AM Subject: RE: Minor typos and the QA guy/scrummaster If all your content is in FM, then you're already "single-sourcing"

Re: Minor typos and the QA guy/scrummaster

2012-07-19 Thread jackdeland
18, 2012 8:22:27 AM Subject: RE: Minor typos and the QA guy/scrummaster You don't mention what format your help docs are produced in, but the implication is that it's PDF - I'd be inclined to encourage the typo-finder to copy & paste the offending section into an e-mail &

RE: Minor typos and the QA guy/scrummaster

2012-07-18 Thread David Creamer
As suggested Using a PDF review cycle, either by email or server-based, should work. All the proof-readers need to do is use the free Adobe Reader to use the insert, delete, and replace text tools for 90% of edits (certainly for typos). Review comments in Acrobat Pro and then import the commen

Re: Minor typos and the QA guy/scrummaster

2012-07-18 Thread Peter Courlis
Mike Wickham To: framers@lists.frameusers.com Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 9:53 AM Subject: Re: Minor typos and the QA guy/scrummaster > He wants a solution that bypasses the need for FrameMaker, and has read an > article that says Word 2013 will allow editing of PDFs in native format. He > wants th

Re: Minor typos and the QA guy/scrummaster

2012-07-18 Thread Bill Swallow
Server-based PDF review works. Everyone can see each other's comments. It solves a lot of back and forth. Plop it up for a review, send the shared link to everyone, give them a deadline, then incorporate the changes. On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 8:58 AM, wrote: > Hello, Framers - > > My QA guy has a

RE: Minor typos and the QA guy/scrummaster

2012-07-18 Thread Jeff Coatsworth
_ From: jackdel...@comcast.net [mailto:jackdel...@comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 10:21 AM To: Jeff Coatsworth Cc: framers Subject: Re: Minor typos and the QA guy/scrummaster If you write once and publish to only one output, I don't think you're "single-sourcing"

RE: Minor typos and the QA guy/scrummaster

2012-07-18 Thread Combs, Richard
jackdel...@comcast.net wrote: > My QA guy has a problem with chasing minor typos in our docs: it takes > longer to document the typo than it does to fix it. He wants a solution > that bypasses the need for FrameMaker, and has read an article that > says Word 2013 will allow editing of PDFs in nat

RE: Minor typos and the QA guy/scrummaster

2012-07-18 Thread Jeff Coatsworth
he QA guy/scrummaster Depends on the output! :) From: "Jeff Coatsworth" To: "framers" Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 8:35:01 AM Subject: RE: Minor typos and the QA guy/scrummaster If all your content is in FM, then you're already

Re: Minor typos and the QA guy/scrummaster

2012-07-18 Thread Lin Sims
e big on security. > > Jack > > > From: "Lin Sims" > To: jackdel...@comcast.net > Cc: "framers" > Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 8:42:01 AM > > Subject: Re: Minor typos and the QA guy/scrummaster > > Well, le

Re: Minor typos and the QA guy/scrummaster

2012-07-18 Thread Mike Wickham
> He wants a solution that bypasses the need for FrameMaker, and has read an article that says Word 2013 will allow editing of PDFs in native format. He wants the developers to be able to do this to my docs. > Ignoring the fact that Microsoft is famous for talking about features in future prod

Re: Minor typos and the QA guy/scrummaster

2012-07-18 Thread Lin Sims
Well, let's see, off the top of my head: 1. Word2013 isn't available yet, so it's going to be hard for your developers to make use of it anytime soon. Not only that, but according to one article, it won't work on any OS prior to Windows 7. 2. From the article I saw on PCWorld, when it IS availabl

RE: Minor typos and the QA guy/scrummaster

2012-07-18 Thread Jeff Coatsworth
t: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 8:22:27 AM Subject: RE: Minor typos and the QA guy/scrummaster You don't mention what format your help docs are produced in, but the implication is that it's PDF - I'd be inclined to encourage the typo-finder to copy & paste the offending sectio

RE: Minor typos and the QA guy/scrummaster

2012-07-18 Thread Jeff Coatsworth
You don't mention what format your help docs are produced in, but the implication is that it's PDF - I'd be inclined to encourage the typo-finder to copy & paste the offending section into an e-mail & fire it off to you for it to be fixed; that sounds like the quickest way. The other alternative