\P\p
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Steve Rickaby
wrote:
> I would have expected the wildcard expression '^$' to detect empty
> lines/paras, but it does not seem to. Does anyone have a wildcard expression
> that *will* find blank lines/empty paras?
Unfortunately, no.
Z
-Original Message-
From: framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Pat Christenson
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 9:50 AM
To: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: Wildcards not working as expected: detect
Hi Pat,
No there is not.
Rick
-Original Message-
From: framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Pat Christenson
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 12:50 PM
To: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: Wildcards not working as
At 11:27 -0500 15/11/12, Rick Quatro wrote:
>Try \P\p
>
>Be careful, though, as it will find paragraphs that have table anchors,
>marker anchors, etc.
Thanks Rick. For some reason that doesn't work reliably for me, but I've
removed all the blank lines manually now.
--
Steve
___
I've often wondered - is there a wildcards combination that skips paragraphs
with anchors?
Pat Christenson
On Nov 15, 2012, at 10:27 AM, Rick Quatro wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> Try \P\p
>
> Be careful, though, as it will find paragraphs that have table anchors,
> marker anchors, etc.
>
> Rick
>
Hi Steve,
Try \P\p
Be careful, though, as it will find paragraphs that have table anchors,
marker anchors, etc.
Rick
Rick Quatro
Carmen Publishing Inc.
585-283-5045
r...@frameexpert.com
To: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Wildcards not working as expected: detect empty paras
I would ha
