I appreciate hearing from vendors on this list. When I was looking for a
replacement for WebWorks Publisher 2003, I would have liked the
opportunity to discuss my options with a participant from Quadralay.
Welcome to the list. I look forward to your ongoing participation!
Andrew VanConas wrote
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 14:01:44 -0400, "Rick Quatro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>I respectfully disagree with the idea of "vendor interference". Since
>third-party products related to FrameMaker are part of many workflows, I
>don't think it is inappropriate at all to talk about them on the list.
Hi Andrew,
I respectfully disagree with the idea of "vendor interference". Since
third-party products related to FrameMaker are part of many workflows, I
don't think it is inappropriate at all to talk about them on the list. To
put the shoe on the other foot, if someone posts a difficulty with
Andrew VanConas
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 7:18 AM
To: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: ePublisher Pro vs. other generated online help
Greetings Framers,
We/WebWorks (Quadralay) very rarely weigh in on this list or any other
list. We believe in nice open discussions with as little
Greetings Framers,
We/WebWorks (Quadralay) very rarely weigh in on this list or any other
list. We believe in nice open discussions with as little vendor
interference as possible. In the 8 years I have worked at WebWorks this
is my first posting to Framers.
In light of the recent discussion on
:20 AM
To: RJ Jacquez
Cc: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: ePublisher Pro vs. other generated online help
RJ,
Thanks for the post.
You mentioned "live link your FrameMaker documents and books." Did you mean
"import by reference", or is there a different linking method
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of RJ Jacquez
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 7:44 AM
To: Patrick Fortino; Jeremy H. Griffith
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; framers@lists.frameusers.com; Bertsche
Subject: RE: ePublisher Pro vs. other generated online
bject: Re: ePublisher Pro vs. other generated online help
First let me say that I think that ePublisher licenses are
highway robbery. For example, they do not allow you to upgrade from an
older version; instead, you pay the full price. I had webworks
publisher pro, or whatever the version was befo
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 12:49:35 -0600, Patrick Fortino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
[Amusing rant snipped.]
Since you mention Mif2Go below, a few comments... OK, it turned
out to be more than a few. ;-)
>However, now that you know my opinion of Webworks as a company, I will
>admit that the new e
Hi Pat,
For the most part, I agree with your rant. I got off the Webworks train
years ago because I couldn't afford to keep up with each new version and
upgrade. As a consultant, there is only so much software I can buy without
regular paying jobs to support it. Omsys, makers of MIF2Go, are ver
First let me say that I think that ePublisher licenses are
highway robbery. For example, they do not allow you to upgrade from an
older version; instead, you pay the full price. I had webworks
publisher pro, or whatever the version was before epublisher. No
upgrade path for that because I
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 14:58:51 -0700, "Callie Bertsche"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>- Have other products sharpened their competitive edge since our last
>tool decision (a few years ago)? For instance, comparisons with MadCap
>or Flare?
>
>In considering a new product, I know immediately I value t
I suspect for less than that upgrade to ePubPro you can get the full
Technical Communication Suite, and have Captivate & Acrobat 9 Pro Extended
to boot.
The TCS integration was developed to handle your Frame files by reference, &
easily handles your variables and conditions as defined in Frame.
L
***Vendor post***
We just released Flare 4, which will do everything I suspect you need and
more. You can download a trial version at www.madcapsoftware.com and sign up
for a demo, if you want. The demo is good, in that it will shows you some of
what the product does.
We can certainly dynamically
14 matches
Mail list logo
