Why hurt Muslims' feelings with creative expressions such as
Islamofascists?
Why hurt Richard's feelings for his use of an innocuous political term? That
term has no more stigma than calling someone a Democrat. You say labels
hurt, yet had no problem trying to label Richard as an ahole.
Mike
>Why hurt Muslims' feelings with creative expressions such as
>Islamofascists?
Why hurt Richard's feelings for his use of an innocuous political term? That
term has no more stigma than calling someone a Democrat. You say labels
hurt, yet had no problem trying to label Richard as an ahole.
Mike
Maybe we should change it to "This page intentionally left almost
completely blank," to be more technically accurate :)
Regards,
Shmuel Wolfson
052-763-7133
Combs, Richard wrote:
Daniel Emory wrote:
Certainly I don't advocate the use of MIL specs for preparing
commercial manual
ect: OT: MIL specs (was RE: general publication quiestion)
To: "Daniel Emory" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,"Framers List"
Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain;charset="us-ascii"
Don't get me wrong -- I'm a huge fan
Maybe we should change it to "This page intentionally left almost
completely blank," to be more technically accurate :)
Regards,
Shmuel Wolfson
052-763-7133
Combs, Richard wrote:
Daniel Emory wrote:
Certainly I don't advocate the use of MIL specs for preparing
commercial manuals.
cists, how do we stop people from coining derogatory phrases using our
religions, ethnicity, and color? This is a land of the free and the brave.
However, some self-regulation is in order.
Where is the moderator?
In response to:
From: "Combs, Richard"
Subject: OT: MIL specs (was RE:
Daniel Emory wrote:
> The fact is that the US military is the only true laboratory
> where technical documentation is subjected to extensive
> post-publication review to determine its effectiveness in the
> real world. Findings resulting from analyses of actual
> foul-ups lead to continuing
Daniel Emory wrote:
> Certainly I don't advocate the use of MIL specs for preparing
> commercial manuals. I do know, however, that most tech
> writers who produce manuals for commercial products remain
> blissfully unaware of the problems caused by their outputs.
A valid point. Although so
Certainly I don't advocate the use of MIL specs for
preparing commercial manuals. I do know, however, that
most tech writers who produce manuals for commercial
products remain blissfully unaware of the problems
caused by their outputs.
Unlike typical users of commercial products, most
users of MI
Your "snip" below deleted from my original post the
main reason I gave for why intentionally blank pages
should be unambiguously labeled. The snipped part was:
"The fact that, more and more, technical manuals are
being delivered as computer files, not professionally
printed and bound paper documen
Daniel Emory wrote:
> Certainly I don't advocate the use of MIL specs for preparing
> commercial manuals. I do know, however, that most tech
> writers who produce manuals for commercial products remain
> blissfully unaware of the problems caused by their outputs.
A valid point. Although som
Certainly I don't advocate the use of MIL specs for
preparing commercial manuals. I do know, however, that
most tech writers who produce manuals for commercial
products remain blissfully unaware of the problems
caused by their outputs.
Unlike typical users of commercial products, most
users of MI
Daniel Emory wrote:
> The fact is that the US military is the only true laboratory
> where technical documentation is subjected to extensive
> post-publication review to determine its effectiveness in the
> real world. Findings resulting from analyses of actual
> foul-ups lead to continuing
Daniel Emory wrote:
> --- Charles Beck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Maybe I'm missing something, and then again, maybe I'm not.
> I too have
> > always considered it a strange paradox when I see the words
> "This page
> > intentionally left blank." But there is no need to use it.
> ===
raft Park
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15238
Doug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
10/18/2006 11:44 AM
To: framers@frameusers.com
cc:
Subject: Re: general publication quiestion
Too often readers will suspect that there was a printing
Hi Susan,
In the field of classified documentation the phrase "This page is
intentionally blank" is used to denote that there is no content on that
page and it is not a printing mitake. The strange thing is that the
blank page also carried the classification so you ended up with a page
classifie
Too often readers will suspect that there was a printing error if
there isn't SOME content on the page. Having headers and footers on
the page with no text between them only makes this type of person even
more prone to suspicion. Putting an "Intentionally Blank" notice on
the page helps to reduc
--- Charles Beck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe I'm missing something, and then again, maybe
> I'm not. I too have
> always considered it a strange paradox when I see
> the words "This page
> intentionally left blank." But there is no need to
> use it.
==
s this frequently come up as an issue? 'Tis a mystery to me...
Chuck Beck
"I speak only for myself."
-Original Message-
Subject: Re: general publication quiestion
I never use "this page intentionally blank". It never made any sense to
me, as by putting text there
Susan Curtzwiler wrote:
Hi all, Is there any hard and fast rule that when you have a blank
left page before a chapter break that you have to label it as "This
page intentionally left blank." ?
I just put a small version of the company logo at the end of the text of
each chapter. Then it's obv
I never use "this page intentionally blank". It never made any sense
to me, as by putting text there it's no longer blank.
On 10/16/06, Susan Curtzwiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
Is there any hard and fast rule that when you have a blank left page before a
chapter break that you h
The short answer is "no," no more than for any other book. Blank pages
are expected and accepted in books that use the convention of starting
chapters on right pages.
I think the labels started being used years ago when military and
mil-spec manuals were issued and updated with change pages. Beca
No, not really, except in certain circles.
The main thing is regarding printed/photocopied material, that if you
see a blank (totally blank) page, that you do not suspect the
printing/photocopying mechanism of skipping a page, which was rather
usual some years ago, when printers and photocopying
23 matches
Mail list logo
