Stuart Rogers wrote:
> Well, those of us who are also forced (kicking & screaming) to work in
MS Word from time to time all probably have the Alt-S-every-two-minutes
> obsessive-compulsive habit...
Yes, indeed! :)
> Come to think of it, I guess I have to thank Word's behaviour for
causing me to a
Stuart Rogers wrote:
> Well, those of us who are also forced (kicking & screaming) to work in
MS Word from time to time all probably have the Alt-S-every-two-minutes
> obsessive-compulsive habit...
Yes, indeed! :)
> Come to think of it, I guess I have to thank Word's behaviour for
causing me to a
Fred Ridder wrote:
> If you only go 10 minutes
> between saves (and who of us ever saves *that* frequently),
Well, those of us who are also forced (kicking & screaming) to work in
MS Word from time to time all probably have the Alt-S-every-two-minutes
obsessive-compulsive habit...
Come to t
Responding to Les Winberg, Art Campbell wrote:
> I'd check the file modification times and file sizes for large
> differences, but in general, open the recovered version.
>
> If there's missing info, open the original's backup copy, assuming you
> have auto backups turned on. And then open the or
I usually do the same thing, except I change the "recover" in the
filename to something like a date. That way Frame doesn't complain that
it sees a recovery file and opens the two files without any hassle.
Berny Gagne
Lead Writer
Husky Injection Molding Systems Ltd.
Bolton,
I'd check the file modification times and file sizes for large
differences, but in general, open the recovered version.
If there's missing info, open the original's backup copy, assuming you
have auto backups turned on. And then open the original. (The opening
order is important, so you don't over
Hello Framers
I am building a Book and got the Book Error Report saying Couldn't open
file because a more recent autosaved or recovered version exists.
There is a recovered version in the folder.
What is the safe thing to do??
Les Winberg
intuition. I'd be glad to
hear if anyone does something different/there are problems with my
method/easier ways to determine whether or not to go with a recovery
version of a .fm file.
-Original Message-
From: framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-bounces at lists.fram
Fred Ridder wrote:
> If you only go 10 minutes
> between saves (and who of us ever saves *that* frequently),
Well, those of us who are also forced (kicking & screaming) to work in
MS Word from time to time all probably have the Alt-S-every-two-minutes
obsessive-compulsive habit...
Come to t
Responding to Les Winberg, Art Campbell wrote:
> I'd check the file modification times and file sizes for large
> differences, but in general, open the recovered version.
>
> If there's missing info, open the original's backup copy, assuming you
> have auto backups turned on. And then open the or
I usually do the same thing, except I change the "recover" in the
filename to something like a date. That way Frame doesn't complain that
it sees a recovery file and opens the two files without any hassle.
Berny Gagne
Lead Writer
Husky Injection Molding Systems Ltd.
Bolton,
I'd check the file modification times and file sizes for large
differences, but in general, open the recovered version.
If there's missing info, open the original's backup copy, assuming you
have auto backups turned on. And then open the original. (The opening
order is important, so you don't over
intuition. I'd be glad to
hear if anyone does something different/there are problems with my
method/easier ways to determine whether or not to go with a recovery
version of a .fm file.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harold
Winberg
Sent:
Hello Framers
I am building a Book and got the Book Error Report saying Couldn't open
file because a more recent autosaved or recovered version exists.
There is a recovered version in the folder.
What is the safe thing to do??
Les Winberg
___
14 matches
Mail list logo
