Mike Feimster wrote:
> Even though the files are binary and you can't do diffs, the other
> benefits of a good version control system are well worth it.
>
> - If you move to structured Frame and XML, you can do diffs as well as
> branching and merging.
Ack! Don't do that. The line-based di
Mike Feimster wrote:
> Even though the files are binary and you can't do diffs, the other
> benefits of a good version control system are well worth it.
>
> - If you move to structured Frame and XML, you can do diffs as well as
> branching and merging.
Ack! Don't do that. The line-based di
, December 10, 2008 6:18 AM
> To: Mike Feimster
> Cc: Framers List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Source Control for Frame
>
> I agree with Mike. We use CVS with our FrameMaker files. Although it is
> a
> bit annoying that FrameMaker thinks it's changed when it often has
+1 519 831 4931 | mobile
+1 519 884 0228 | fax
http://www.onsemi.com
"Mike Feimster"
Sent by: framers-bounces at lists.frameusers.com
12/10/2008 09:01 AM
To
, "Donald M Rinderknecht"
, "Flato, Gillian"
cc
Framers List
Su
nal Message-
From: framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-bounces at lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of
quills at airmail.net
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 3:36 PM
To: Donald M Rinderknecht; Flato, Gillian
Cc: Framers List
Subject: Re: Source Control for Frame
At 1:53 PM -0600 1
f Of FeiMin_Lorente at amis.com
> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 6:18 AM
> To: Mike Feimster
> Cc: Framers List; framers-bounces at lists.frameusers.com
> Subject: RE: Source Control for Frame
>
> I agree with Mike. We use CVS with our FrameMaker files. Although it is
> a
> bit
ato, Gillian"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc
Framers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject
RE: Source Control for Frame
Even though the files are binary and you can't do diffs, the other
benefits of a good version control system are well worth it.
- You can always go back to a pre
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 3:36 PM
To: Donald M Rinderknecht; Flato, Gillian
Cc: Framers List
Subject: Re: Source Control for Frame
At 1:53 PM -0600 12/9/08, Donald M Rinderknecht wrote:
>Hi
At 1:53 PM -0600 12/9/08, Donald M Rinderknecht wrote:
>Hi Gillian,
>
>Other than the diff report (which I assume provides more details than
>just a time/date stamp) is SVN useful?
>
>I've been wanting some centralized document management for our
>FrameMaker (and other) files for a long time. We ha
Hi Gillian,
Other than the diff report (which I assume provides more details than
just a time/date stamp) is SVN useful?
I've been wanting some centralized document management for our
FrameMaker (and other) files for a long time. We have several folks that
author materials, sometimes in teams.
At 1:53 PM -0600 12/9/08, Donald M Rinderknecht wrote:
>Hi Gillian,
>
>Other than the diff report (which I assume provides more details than
>just a time/date stamp) is SVN useful?
>
>I've been wanting some centralized document management for our
>FrameMaker (and other) files for a long time. We ha
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 13:53:38 -0600, Donald M Rinderknecht
wrote:
>Folks have mentioned going to MIF files or XML. Wouldn't those options
>add steps to the workflow? I assume they (MIF or XML) would affect the
>workflow in a similar fashion. Also, going to XML would require
>structure (I assum
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 13:53:38 -0600, Donald M Rinderknecht
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Folks have mentioned going to MIF files or XML. Wouldn't those options
>add steps to the workflow? I assume they (MIF or XML) would affect the
>workflow in a similar fashion. Also, going to XML would require
Hi Gillian,
Other than the diff report (which I assume provides more details than
just a time/date stamp) is SVN useful?
I've been wanting some centralized document management for our
FrameMaker (and other) files for a long time. We have several folks that
author materials, sometimes in teams.
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 2:47 PM
To: Scott Prentice
Cc: Framers List
Subject: Re: Source Control for Frame
When I was at EMC, we used Documentum for source control and it
handled binaries just fine. You may, however, find the price tag a bit
steep.
>> Is there any source control out there
When I was at EMC, we used Documentum for source control and it
handled binaries just fine. You may, however, find the price tag a bit
steep.
>> Is there any source control out there that works really well with Frame?
>> We have subversion here, but that can only read ASCII files. It stores
--
J
t; From: Scott Prentice
> Subject: Re: Source Control for Frame
> To: "John Posada"
> Cc: "Framers List"
> Date: Monday, December 8, 2008, 1:59 PM
>
> Hi John...
>
> By "handle binaries" .. what did it actually d
t; From: Scott Prentice
> Subject: Re: Source Control for Frame
> To: "John Posada"
> Cc: "Framers List"
> Date: Monday, December 8, 2008, 1:59 PM
>
> Hi John...
>
> By "handle binaries" .. what did it actually d
Scott Prentice
Cc: Framers List
Subject: Re: Source Control for Frame
When I was at EMC, we used Documentum for source control and it
handled binaries just fine. You may, however, find the price tag a bit
steep.
>> Is there any source control out there that works really well with
Frame?
Have you looked at Sourcerer, from Advantica, Inc?
Adobe has a Success Story at
www.adobe.com/products/framemaker/pdfs/advantica_ss.pdf.
--- On Mon, 12/8/08, Scott Prentice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: Scott Prentice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Source Control for Fra
Have you looked at Sourcerer, from Advantica, Inc?
?
Adobe has a Success Story at
www.adobe.com/products/framemaker/pdfs/advantica_ss.pdf.
--- On Mon, 12/8/08, Scott Prentice wrote:
From: Scott Prentice
Subject: Re: Source Control for Frame
To: "John Posada"
Cc: "Framers List
Hi John...
By "handle binaries" .. what did it actually do? Did it do a binary diff
on the files and only store the changes or did it store each update as a
whole blob? And did it provide you with the actual diffs of the content
without running FM?
...scott
John Posada wrote:
> When I was at
Hi John...
By "handle binaries" .. what did it actually do? Did it do a binary diff
on the files and only store the changes or did it store each update as a
whole blob? And did it provide you with the actual diffs of the content
without running FM?
...scott
John Posada wrote:
> When I was at
When I was at EMC, we used Documentum for source control and it
handled binaries just fine. You may, however, find the price tag a bit
steep.
>> Is there any source control out there that works really well with Frame?
>> We have subversion here, but that can only read ASCII files. It stores
--
J
I'm not aware of any way to use source control for binary files (FM or
otherwise) other than just being able to know if the file has changed
(even that may not really be very accurate). And there's no way to do a
useful diff of two FM files other than using the Compare utility in FM.
This is on
I'm not aware of any way to use source control for binary files (FM or
otherwise) other than just being able to know if the file has changed
(even that may not really be very accurate). And there's no way to do a
useful diff of two FM files other than using the Compare utility in FM.
This is on
Is there any source control out there that works really well with Frame?
We have subversion here, but that can only read ASCII files. It stores
Frame's proprietary files and graphics, but it can't do a diff report on
them. Or at least, is there any source control that can read PDFs and do
diff repo
Is there any source control out there that works really well with Frame?
We have subversion here, but that can only read ASCII files. It stores
Frame's proprietary files and graphics, but it can't do a diff report on
them. Or at least, is there any source control that can read PDFs and do
diff repo
28 matches
Mail list logo
