RE: Structured Frame s-l-o-w-l-y opening a document

:36 +1300 From: Trevor Nicholls [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Structured Frame s-l-o-w-l-y opening a document To: framers@lists.frameusers.com Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi I was interested to read the recent discussions about (why/why not) use structured

Structured Frame s-l-o-w-l-y opening a document

Hi I was interested to read the recent discussions about (why/why not) use structured Framemaker. I started with Framemaker at version 7.2, have never known anything but structured authoring, and adopting unstructured authoring doesn't appeal to me as a positive move in any way. However, that's

Structured Frame s-l-o-w-l-y opening a document

:36 +1300 From: "Trevor Nicholls" <tre...@castingthevoid.com> Subject: Structured Frame s-l-o-w-l-y opening a document To: Message-ID: <000501c754ed$944460c0$0401010a at TREVOR> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Hi I was interested to read the recent dis

Structured Frame s-l-o-w-l-y opening a document

Hi I was interested to read the recent discussions about (why/why not) use structured Framemaker. I started with Framemaker at version 7.2, have never known anything but structured authoring, and adopting unstructured authoring doesn't appeal to me as a positive move in any way. However, that's