XML and FrameMaker

r authoring XML content. Regards Mark Poston -Original Message- From: framers-bounces+mark.poston=mekon.com at lists.frameusers.com [mailto:framers-bounces+mark.poston=mekon@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Pedro Pastor Sent: 17 January 2007 18:46 To: framers at FrameUsers.com Subje

RE: XML and FrameMaker

r authoring XML content. Regards Mark Poston -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pedro Pastor Sent: 17 January 2007 18:46 To: framers@FrameUsers.com Subject: RE: XML and FrameMaker Hi Scott, Thanks for the info, but DocBook is not the problem he

XML and FrameMaker

Hi Scott, Thanks for the info, but DocBook is not the problem here. I have some good command of the XML DocBook DTD (from version 3). I have also developed simplified version for DocBook for organization specific needs (just to realize myself that there is nothing better than using the original).

XML and FrameMaker

eusers.com [mailto:framers-bounces+mark.poston=mekon@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Pedro Pastor Sent: 17 January 2007 10:44 To: framers at FrameUsers.com Subject: XML and FrameMaker Thank you very much to you for your response. I can see I misunderstood some point on this topic, but some doubts still

XML and FrameMaker

FM is primarily a presentation tool. It formats and produces a media specific output. Something like Epic Editor is primarily an SGML tool that ignores media specific output. The structure is all that is of importance. The short answer to your question is yes. You don't need a template (styles

RE: XML and FrameMaker

FM is primarily a presentation tool. It formats and produces a media specific output. Something like Epic Editor is primarily an SGML tool that ignores media specific output. The structure is all that is of importance. The short answer to your question is yes. You don't need a template (styl

RE: XML and FrameMaker

ot; structured text, even if the "look&feel" is very basic (even if it is tag based)? Regards, Pedro -Mensaje original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de [EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: miércoles, 17 de enero de 2007 18:09 Para: Pedro Pastor; fram

XML and FrameMaker

Thank you very much to you for your response. I can see I misunderstood some point on this topic, but some doubts still remains in the roundtrip process. In any case I didn?t mean that working with a ?tag-based? editor + ?style-sheets? is better than working with FM (from the authoring point of vi

XML and FrameMaker

I recommend that you check the original, and downloadable DTDs for Docbook. http://www.docbook.org/ They also have a Simplified Docbook which might help you also. There are at least two books that I'm aware of that give an explanation of the Docbook DTD. Go to the above site and check them out

XML and FrameMaker

2007 5:44 AM To: framers at FrameUsers.com Subject: XML and FrameMaker Thank you very much to you for your response. I can see I misunderstood some point on this topic, but some doubts still remains in the roundtrip process. In any case I didn't mean that working with a "tag-based" editor +

Re: XML and FrameMaker

I recommend that you check the original, and downloadable DTDs for Docbook. http://www.docbook.org/ They also have a Simplified Docbook which might help you also. There are at least two books that I'm aware of that give an explanation of the Docbook DTD. Go to the above site and check them ou

RE: XML and FrameMaker

astor Sent: 17 January 2007 10:44 To: framers@FrameUsers.com Subject: XML and FrameMaker Thank you very much to you for your response. I can see I misunderstood some point on this topic, but some doubts still remains in the roundtrip process. In any case I didn't mean that working with a &qu

RE: XML and FrameMaker

instance with Framemaker. Notice that nowhere is an EDD specified. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pedro Pastor Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 5:44 AM To: framers@FrameUsers.com Subject: XML and FrameMaker Thank you very much to you fo

XML and FrameMaker

Thank you very much to you for your response. I can see I misunderstood some point on this topic, but some doubts still remains in the roundtrip process. In any case I didn’t mean that working with a “tag-based” editor + “style-sheets” is better than working with FM (from the authoring point of v