RE: oldie (was: keep with next para)

2008-02-05 Thread Diane Gaskill
: Re: oldie (was: keep with next para) Graeme R Forbes wrote: Um, just an FYI, Graeme has been on this list for at least 5 years that I know of. This made me wonder. I find in my archives a message dated 10/28/93 that referred to my previous postings complaining about FM's footnote handling

oldie (was: keep with next para)

2008-02-05 Thread Diane Gaskill
To: framers at lists.frameusers.com Subject: Re: oldie (was: keep with next para) Graeme R Forbes wrote: > >>Um, just an FYI, Graeme has been on this list for at least 5 years that I >>know of. > > This made me wonder. I find in my archives a message dated 10/28/93

RE: oldie (was: keep with next para)

2008-02-04 Thread Diane Gaskill
To: framers@lists.frameusers.com Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: oldie (was: keep with next para) Diane: Thanks for the suggestion about using the reference page -- hadn't thought of that, I'll see if I can make it work. Um, just an FYI, Graeme has been on this list for at least 5 years that I

Re: oldie (was: keep with next para)

2008-02-04 Thread Jeremy H. Griffith
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 03:51:08 -0800, Diane Gaskill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I wonder how many of us there are still on the list from those olden days. raises hand I've been on it since it was hosted on uunet; I forget what year. After that I recall three volunteer admins at different

oldie (was: keep with next para)

2008-02-04 Thread Alan Litchfield
Graeme R Forbes wrote: > >>Um, just an FYI, Graeme has been on this list for at least 5 years that I >>know of. > > This made me wonder. I find in my archives a message dated 10/28/93 > that referred to my previous postings complaining about FM's footnote > handling and the failure to fix the

oldie (was: keep with next para)

2008-02-04 Thread Diane Gaskill
ebruary 03, 2008 1:07 AM To: framers at lists.frameusers.com Cc: dgcaller at earthlink.net Subject: oldie (was: keep with next para) Diane: Thanks for the suggestion about using the reference page -- hadn't thought of that, I'll see if I can make it work. >Um, just an FYI, Graeme has been

oldie (was: keep with next para)

2008-02-04 Thread Jeremy H. Griffith
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 03:51:08 -0800, "Diane Gaskill" wrote: >I wonder how many of us there are still on the list from those >"olden" days. I've been on it since it was hosted on uunet; I forget what year. After that I recall three volunteer admins at different universities before Brad came

oldie (was: keep with next para)

2008-02-03 Thread Graeme R Forbes
Diane: Thanks for the suggestion about using the reference page -- hadn't thought of that, I'll see if I can make it work. Um, just an FYI, Graeme has been on this list for at least 5 years that I know of. This made me wonder. I find in my archives a message dated 10/28/93 that referred to

Re: oldie (was: keep with next para)

2008-02-03 Thread Alan Litchfield
Graeme R Forbes wrote: Um, just an FYI, Graeme has been on this list for at least 5 years that I know of. This made me wonder. I find in my archives a message dated 10/28/93 that referred to my previous postings complaining about FM's footnote handling and the failure to fix the problem in

oldie (was: keep with next para)

2008-02-03 Thread Graeme R Forbes
Diane: Thanks for the suggestion about using the reference page -- hadn't thought of that, I'll see if I can make it work. >Um, just an FYI, Graeme has been on this list for at least 5 years that I >know of. This made me wonder. I find in my archives a message dated 10/28/93 that referred to